2015Journal of Biometrics & BiostatisticsOpen access

Analyzing Multiple Outcomes: Is it Really Worth the use of Multivariate Linear Regression?

Rosa Oliveira, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

In health related research it is common to have multiple outcomes of interest in a single study.These outcomes are often analysed separately, ignoring the correlation between them.One would expect that a multivariate approach would be a more efficient alternative to individual analyses of each outcome.Surprisingly, this is not always the case.In this article we discuss different settings of linear models and compare the multivariate and univariate approaches.We show that for linear regression models, the estimates of the regression parameters associated with covariates that are shared across the outcomes are the same for the multivariate and univariate models while for outcome-specific covariates the multivariate model performs better in terms of efficiency.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In health related research it is common to have multiple outcomes of interest in a single study.These outcomes are often analysed separately, ignoring the correlation between them.One would expect that a multivariate approach would be a more efficient alternative to individual analyses of each outcome.Surprisingly, this is not always the case.In this article we discuss different settings of linear models and compare the multivariate and univariate approaches.We show that for linear regression models, the estimates of the regression parameters associated with covariates that are shared across the outcomes are the same for the multivariate and univariate models while for outcome-specific covariates the multivariate model performs better in terms of efficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In health related research it is common to have multiple outcomes of interest in a single study.These outcomes are often analysed separately, ignoring the correlation between them.One would expect that a multivariate approach would be a more efficient alternative to individual analyses of each outcome.Surprisingly, this is not always the case.In this article we discuss different settings of linear models and compare the multivariate and univariate approaches.We show that for linear regression models, the estimates of the regression parameters associated with covariates that are shared across the outcomes are the same for the multivariate and univariate models while for outcome-specific covariates the multivariate model performs better in terms of efficiency.

Key concepts: Multivariate statistics, Univariate, Bayesian multivariate linear regression, Covariate, Multivariate analysis, Outcome (game theory), Computer science, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analyzing Multiple Outcomes: Is it Really Worth the use of Multivariate Linear Regression? — Research Paper | ScholarLens