1993•SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesRequires access

Experimental Consideration on Headform Impact Test for Pedestrian Protection

Minoru Sakurai, Kazushige Kobayashi, Hirotoshi Ishikawa, Koshiro Ono, Akira Sasaki, Shogo Misawa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Improvements for pedestrian head protection in a car-pedestrian accident have been discussed in several countries. Test methods for evaluating head protection have been proposed, and most are sub-systems using rigid headforms with or without headskin. In those tests, HIC is used as a criterion for head protection. This paper discusses the test conditions and requirements of the headform impact test. The influence of different test conditions and their importance on head impact test requirements, were verified. The primary items cited are as follows: (1) The results of the rigid headform were similar to that of the human cadaver skull in cases without skull fractures. Consequently, the rigid headform can be used for the impactor simulating a condition without skull fracture. (2) In the cases of HIC≤1000, the force-deformation curves of the hoodtops showed similar characteristics with maximum dynamic deformations over 60mm. (3) Impactor mass affected the maximum acceleration and HIC. Impactor mass appears to be an important factor in test conditions. (4) The test results with and without headskin (Hybrid-III) showed almost no difference in the maximum acceleration and the HIC. The presence of a headskin on the impactor is not an important factor in test conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Improvements for pedestrian head protection in a car-pedestrian accident have been discussed in several countries. Test methods for evaluating head protection have been proposed, and most are sub-systems using rigid headforms with or without headskin. In those tests, HIC is used as a criterion for head protection. This paper discusses the test conditions and requirements of the headform impact test. The influence of different test conditions and their importance on head impact test requirements, were verified. The primary items cited are as follows: (1) The results of the rigid headform were similar to that of the human cadaver skull in cases without skull fractures. Consequently, the rigid headform can be used for the impactor simulating a condition without skull fracture. (2) In the cases of HIC≤1000, the force-deformation curves of the hoodtops showed similar characteristics with maximum dynamic deformations over 60mm. (3) Impactor mass affected the maximum acceleration and HIC. Impactor mass appears to be an important factor in test conditions. (4) The test results with and without headskin (Hybrid-III) showed almost no difference in the maximum acceleration and the HIC. The presence of a headskin on the impactor is not an important factor in test conditions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Improvements for pedestrian head protection in a car-pedestrian accident have been discussed in several countries. Test methods for evaluating head protection have been proposed, and most are sub-systems using rigid headforms with or without headskin. In those tests, HIC is used as a criterion for head protection. This paper discusses the test conditions and requirements of the headform impact test. The influence of different test conditions and their importance on head impact test requirements, were verified. The primary items cited are as follows: (1) The results of the rigid headform were similar to that of the human cadaver skull in cases without skull fractures. Consequently, the rigid headform can be used for the impactor simulating a condition without skull fracture. (2) In the cases of HIC≤1000, the force-deformation curves of the hoodtops showed similar characteristics with maximum dynamic deformations over 60mm. (3) Impactor mass affected the maximum acceleration and HIC. Impactor mass appears to be an important factor in test conditions. (4) The test results with and without headskin (Hybrid-III) showed almost no difference in the maximum acceleration and the HIC. The presence of a headskin on the impactor is not an important factor in test conditions.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Test (biology), Environmental science, Computer science, Forensic engineering, Engineering, Transport engineering, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental Consideration on Headform Impact Test for Pedestrian Protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens