1993PubMedRequires access

Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

J Niinikoski, T Havia, E Alhava, Markus Pääkkönen, Pekka Miettinen, E. Kivilaakso, Reijo Haapiainen, M Matikainen, S Laitinen

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

The current multicenter study was conducted at five sites using 86 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 grams per 500 milligrams every eight hours) compared with imipenem/cilastatin (1 gram every eight hours) in the treatment of patients who were hospitalized with a clinically or bacteriologically confirmed diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. Forty-seven patients received piperacillin/tazobactam and 39 received imipenem/cilastatin. The favorable response among patients who were clinically evaluable with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 87 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 77 percent. Bacteriologic eradication rate among bacteriologically evaluable patients with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 89 percent. The eradication rate of pathogens isolated from patients who were evaluable by biologic factors in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent and in the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin treatment, 96 percent. In the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam the incidence and type of adverse reactions were similar to those seen with piperacillin alone. It is concluded that piperacillin/tazobactam is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients hospitalized with intraabdominal infections and that tazobactam extends the spectrum of piperacillin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current multicenter study was conducted at five sites using 86 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 grams per 500 milligrams every eight hours) compared with imipenem/cilastatin (1 gram every eight hours) in the treatment of patients who were hospitalized with a clinically or bacteriologically confirmed diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. Forty-seven patients received piperacillin/tazobactam and 39 received imipenem/cilastatin. The favorable response among patients who were clinically evaluable with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 87 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 77 percent. Bacteriologic eradication rate among bacteriologically evaluable patients with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 89 percent. The eradication rate of pathogens isolated from patients who were evaluable by biologic factors in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent and in the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin treatment, 96 percent. In the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam the incidence and type of adverse reactions were similar to those seen with piperacillin alone. It is concluded that piperacillin/tazobactam is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients hospitalized with intraabdominal infections and that tazobactam extends the spectrum of piperacillin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current multicenter study was conducted at five sites using 86 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 grams per 500 milligrams every eight hours) compared with imipenem/cilastatin (1 gram every eight hours) in the treatment of patients who were hospitalized with a clinically or bacteriologically confirmed diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. Forty-seven patients received piperacillin/tazobactam and 39 received imipenem/cilastatin. The favorable response among patients who were clinically evaluable with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 87 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 77 percent. Bacteriologic eradication rate among bacteriologically evaluable patients with a valid response in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent. In the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin it was 89 percent. The eradication rate of pathogens isolated from patients who were evaluable by biologic factors in the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam was 100 percent and in the group treated with imipenem/cilastatin treatment, 96 percent. In the group treated with piperacillin/tazobactam the incidence and type of adverse reactions were similar to those seen with piperacillin alone. It is concluded that piperacillin/tazobactam is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients hospitalized with intraabdominal infections and that tazobactam extends the spectrum of piperacillin.

Key concepts: Cilastatin, Medicine, Imipenem/cilastatin, Piperacillin/tazobactam, Piperacillin, Tazobactam, Imipenem, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. — Research Paper | ScholarLens