1989Indian Journal of Animal NutritionOpen access

Nutrient Utilization and Passage Rate of Digesta on Feeding of Urea Supplemented and Urea Ammoniated Wheat Straw in Cross-Bred Cattle

Han Verdonk, Gaurav Pratap Singh, Brahma N. Gupta

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

A feeding -cum-metabolism experiment was conducted on eight rumen fistulated adult cross-bred cattle divided Into two equal groups fed on ad lib wheat straw either Impregnated with 2 per cent urea, 10 per cent molasses (Gp I) or treated and ensiled with 4 per cent urea, 40 per cent moisture for 4 weeks (Gp. II). DM intake (Kg/d) in the two groups was 6.98± 0.71 and 6.07±036 (P>0.05) respectively. The OM digestibility increased (P< 0.05) from 55.25 ± 1.19 per cent in GP I to 60.10±1.17 per cent in GP II with corresponding increase (P<0.01) in CF digestibility from 42.69 ± 1.51 to 52.86 ± 0.64 per cent. The CP digestibility was similar in both the groups but the DCP contents was higher (P<0.05) in urea treated straw. However, the TDN content was higher (P<0.05) in urea-molasses supplemented straw. N balances in the two groups were 3.58+1.19 and 4.03±153 g/d respectively. The passage rate of digesta in the two groups was similar but the turnover time was significantly (P<0.05) higher in GP II than in GP I. The lower (P<0.01) cost of feeding in urea treated group suggested an economical means of increasing the nutritive value of wheat straw.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A feeding -cum-metabolism experiment was conducted on eight rumen fistulated adult cross-bred cattle divided Into two equal groups fed on ad lib wheat straw either Impregnated with 2 per cent urea, 10 per cent molasses (Gp I) or treated and ensiled with 4 per cent urea, 40 per cent moisture for 4 weeks (Gp. II). DM intake (Kg/d) in the two groups was 6.98± 0.71 and 6.07±036 (P>0.05) respectively. The OM digestibility increased (P< 0.05) from 55.25 ± 1.19 per cent in GP I to 60.10±1.17 per cent in GP II with corresponding increase (P<0.01) in CF digestibility from 42.69 ± 1.51 to 52.86 ± 0.64 per cent. The CP digestibility was similar in both the groups but the DCP contents was higher (P<0.05) in urea treated straw. However, the TDN content was higher (P<0.05) in urea-molasses supplemented straw. N balances in the two groups were 3.58+1.19 and 4.03±153 g/d respectively. The passage rate of digesta in the two groups was similar but the turnover time was significantly (P<0.05) higher in GP II than in GP I. The lower (P<0.01) cost of feeding in urea treated group suggested an economical means of increasing the nutritive value of wheat straw.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A feeding -cum-metabolism experiment was conducted on eight rumen fistulated adult cross-bred cattle divided Into two equal groups fed on ad lib wheat straw either Impregnated with 2 per cent urea, 10 per cent molasses (Gp I) or treated and ensiled with 4 per cent urea, 40 per cent moisture for 4 weeks (Gp. II). DM intake (Kg/d) in the two groups was 6.98± 0.71 and 6.07±036 (P>0.05) respectively. The OM digestibility increased (P< 0.05) from 55.25 ± 1.19 per cent in GP I to 60.10±1.17 per cent in GP II with corresponding increase (P<0.01) in CF digestibility from 42.69 ± 1.51 to 52.86 ± 0.64 per cent. The CP digestibility was similar in both the groups but the DCP contents was higher (P<0.05) in urea treated straw. However, the TDN content was higher (P<0.05) in urea-molasses supplemented straw. N balances in the two groups were 3.58+1.19 and 4.03±153 g/d respectively. The passage rate of digesta in the two groups was similar but the turnover time was significantly (P<0.05) higher in GP II than in GP I. The lower (P<0.01) cost of feeding in urea treated group suggested an economical means of increasing the nutritive value of wheat straw.

Key concepts: Urea, Straw, Rumen, Animal science, Nutrient, Veterinary medicine, Agronomy, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nutrient Utilization and Passage Rate of Digesta on Feeding of Urea Supplemented and Urea Ammoniated Wheat Straw in Cross-Bred Cattle — Research Paper | ScholarLens