2007Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparative Study on Three Poverty Measures

Jiyoung Yoo, Hongjik Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines three poverty measures which can be utilized for poverty comparison or policy research. In terms of policy research, whether or how a specific policy affects poverty may depend on the particular way in which poverty is measured. Poverty measures will also determine the picture of poverty comparison among groups. However, past studies on poverty still adopt income or poverty rate as virtually the only indicator of poverty, which suggests that they have done little to publicize other dimensions of poverty. This limitation may also distort the public perception of poverty or social policies. Given these conditions, this paper investigates three poverty measures, which include poverty rate, the poverty gap and the squared poverty gap. These three measures would yield more comprehensive pictures of poverty by measuring different dimensions of poverty. This paper also presents statistical findings which are obtained from the March Current Population Survey data. The implications of this study would be that it is not safe to rely on a limited measure of poverty. Multiangulating results obtained by using multiple poverty measures will be a more secure basis for drawing conclusions than using single dimensions, especially in poverty comparison or policy research area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines three poverty measures which can be utilized for poverty comparison or policy research. In terms of policy research, whether or how a specific policy affects poverty may depend on the particular way in which poverty is measured. Poverty measures will also determine the picture of poverty comparison among groups. However, past studies on poverty still adopt income or poverty rate as virtually the only indicator of poverty, which suggests that they have done little to publicize other dimensions of poverty. This limitation may also distort the public perception of poverty or social policies. Given these conditions, this paper investigates three poverty measures, which include poverty rate, the poverty gap and the squared poverty gap. These three measures would yield more comprehensive pictures of poverty by measuring different dimensions of poverty. This paper also presents statistical findings which are obtained from the March Current Population Survey data. The implications of this study would be that it is not safe to rely on a limited measure of poverty. Multiangulating results obtained by using multiple poverty measures will be a more secure basis for drawing conclusions than using single dimensions, especially in poverty comparison or policy research area.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines three poverty measures which can be utilized for poverty comparison or policy research. In terms of policy research, whether or how a specific policy affects poverty may depend on the particular way in which poverty is measured. Poverty measures will also determine the picture of poverty comparison among groups. However, past studies on poverty still adopt income or poverty rate as virtually the only indicator of poverty, which suggests that they have done little to publicize other dimensions of poverty. This limitation may also distort the public perception of poverty or social policies. Given these conditions, this paper investigates three poverty measures, which include poverty rate, the poverty gap and the squared poverty gap. These three measures would yield more comprehensive pictures of poverty by measuring different dimensions of poverty. This paper also presents statistical findings which are obtained from the March Current Population Survey data. The implications of this study would be that it is not safe to rely on a limited measure of poverty. Multiangulating results obtained by using multiple poverty measures will be a more secure basis for drawing conclusions than using single dimensions, especially in poverty comparison or policy research area.

Key concepts: Poverty, Measuring poverty, Economics, Population, Poverty rate, Basic needs, Culture of poverty, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study on Three Poverty Measures — Research Paper | ScholarLens