2001Indian Journal of AgronomyOpen access

Weed dynamics, productivity and soil health under different tillage and weed- control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum)maize (Zea mays) cropping sequence

Chander Shekhar, Dhan Pal Singh, A.K. Singh, V. Nepalia, Jagdish Choudhary

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 200910 and 201011 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, to study effect of 5 tillage systems and 3 weed-control practices on weed dynamics, productivity, and to workout most viable tillage practices in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) Emend. Fiori & Paol.]maize (Zea may L.) cropping sequence. Weed density, grain yield of wheat, maize and wheat-equivalent yield were found statistically equal in continuous conventional tillage and adoption of rotated zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize un- der wheatmaize cropping sequence. Adoption of zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize also proved economically beneficial with the highest net returns ( 73,868/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11) compared to net returns ( 72,476/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1: 94) recorded under continuous conventional tillage in both crops. Amongst the weed-control practices, use of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) fol- lowed by 1 hoeing in maize significantly reduced weed density, dry matter and recorded significantly higher wheatmaize and wheat-equivalent grain and straw yields than 2 hand weedings and weedy check. Application of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) in maize resulted in the highest net returns of 82,749/ ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.41 and proved significantly higher over 2 hand-weedings by 5,876/ha and benefit: cost ratio 0.43. At the end of 2 cycles adopting zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize significantly enhanced organic carbon content by 4.0% over continuous conventional tillage; however, did not influence status of available nitrogen and phosphorus significantly in soil. The weed-control practices did not influence available ni- trogen status of soil; however, organic carbon and available phosphorus status of weedy check plots increased significantly over rest of the weed-control treatments.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted during 200910 and 201011 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, to study effect of 5 tillage systems and 3 weed-control practices on weed dynamics, productivity, and to workout most viable tillage practices in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) Emend. Fiori & Paol.]maize (Zea may L.) cropping sequence. Weed density, grain yield of wheat, maize and wheat-equivalent yield were found statistically equal in continuous conventional tillage and adoption of rotated zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize un- der wheatmaize cropping sequence. Adoption of zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize also proved economically beneficial with the highest net returns ( 73,868/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11) compared to net returns ( 72,476/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1: 94) recorded under continuous conventional tillage in both crops. Amongst the weed-control practices, use of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) fol- lowed by 1 hoeing in maize significantly reduced weed density, dry matter and recorded significantly higher wheatmaize and wheat-equivalent grain and straw yields than 2 hand weedings and weedy check. Application of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) in maize resulted in the highest net returns of 82,749/ ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.41 and proved significantly higher over 2 hand-weedings by 5,876/ha and benefit: cost ratio 0.43. At the end of 2 cycles adopting zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize significantly enhanced organic carbon content by 4.0% over continuous conventional tillage; however, did not influence status of available nitrogen and phosphorus significantly in soil. The weed-control practices did not influence available ni- trogen status of soil; however, organic carbon and available phosphorus status of weedy check plots increased significantly over rest of the weed-control treatments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 200910 and 201011 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, to study effect of 5 tillage systems and 3 weed-control practices on weed dynamics, productivity, and to workout most viable tillage practices in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) Emend. Fiori & Paol.]maize (Zea may L.) cropping sequence. Weed density, grain yield of wheat, maize and wheat-equivalent yield were found statistically equal in continuous conventional tillage and adoption of rotated zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize un- der wheatmaize cropping sequence. Adoption of zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize also proved economically beneficial with the highest net returns ( 73,868/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.11) compared to net returns ( 72,476/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1: 94) recorded under continuous conventional tillage in both crops. Amongst the weed-control practices, use of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) fol- lowed by 1 hoeing in maize significantly reduced weed density, dry matter and recorded significantly higher wheatmaize and wheat-equivalent grain and straw yields than 2 hand weedings and weedy check. Application of isoproturon (0.75 kg/ha) in wheat and atrazine (0.5 kg/ha) in maize resulted in the highest net returns of 82,749/ ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.41 and proved significantly higher over 2 hand-weedings by 5,876/ha and benefit: cost ratio 0.43. At the end of 2 cycles adopting zero tillage in wheat and conventional tillage in maize significantly enhanced organic carbon content by 4.0% over continuous conventional tillage; however, did not influence status of available nitrogen and phosphorus significantly in soil. The weed-control practices did not influence available ni- trogen status of soil; however, organic carbon and available phosphorus status of weedy check plots increased significantly over rest of the weed-control treatments.

Key concepts: Tillage, Agronomy, Conventional tillage, Mathematics, Weed, Weed control, No-till farming, Straw

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Weed dynamics, productivity and soil health under different tillage and weed- control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum)maize (Zea mays) cropping sequence — Research Paper | ScholarLens