2009The FASEB JournalRequires access

Profile of prostaglandin E1 and E2 binding to four subtype prostaglandin E receptors

Annirudha Chillar, Anita Mohite, Shui‐Ping So, Ke‐He Ruan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Prostaglandin E 1 (PGE 1 ) and E 2 (PGE 2 ) are ligands for prostaglandin E 2 receptor (EP) family, which are designated as EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 and EP 4 . Interestingly, PGE 2 mediates inflammation whereas PGE 1 is acting as an anti‐inflammatory factor. However the molecular basis of their opposite actions on the EP receptors is poorly understood. In this study, the PGE 1 and PGE 2 binding affinity and signaling on the human recombinant EPs expressed in the live HEK293 stable cell lines were determined by [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding and the calcium and cyclic AMP signaling, respectively. The Kd of [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding to the EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 & EP 4 was 0.35 nM, 0.45 nM, 0.021 nM, and 0.047 nM, respectively. PGE 2 showed higher affinity or preference for EP 3 and EP 4 as compared to that of EP 1 and EP 2 . The IC50 thus calculated from [ 3 H]PGE 2 displacement experiments using cold PGE 1 and PGE 2 for the EPs is, EP 1 ( PGE 1 0.1mM, PGE 2 5μM), EP 2 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 1μM), EP 3 ( PGE 1 1μM,PGE 2 100 nM) and EP 4 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 100nM). PGE 1 showed a higher calcium signal in EP 1 as compared to that of PGE 2 . In addition, there was a one log concentration difference between PGE 2 and PGE 1 for generation of calcium signal in EP 4 . The calcium signal indicated that the EP 1 is the likely dominant receptor in terms of signaling in tissues that co express the EPs. This study provides a molecular basis to understand the biological functions of PGE 1 and PGE 2 through their binding and signaling properties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prostaglandin E 1 (PGE 1 ) and E 2 (PGE 2 ) are ligands for prostaglandin E 2 receptor (EP) family, which are designated as EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 and EP 4 . Interestingly, PGE 2 mediates inflammation whereas PGE 1 is acting as an anti‐inflammatory factor. However the molecular basis of their opposite actions on the EP receptors is poorly understood. In this study, the PGE 1 and PGE 2 binding affinity and signaling on the human recombinant EPs expressed in the live HEK293 stable cell lines were determined by [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding and the calcium and cyclic AMP signaling, respectively. The Kd of [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding to the EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 & EP 4 was 0.35 nM, 0.45 nM, 0.021 nM, and 0.047 nM, respectively. PGE 2 showed higher affinity or preference for EP 3 and EP 4 as compared to that of EP 1 and EP 2 . The IC50 thus calculated from [ 3 H]PGE 2 displacement experiments using cold PGE 1 and PGE 2 for the EPs is, EP 1 ( PGE 1 0.1mM, PGE 2 5μM), EP 2 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 1μM), EP 3 ( PGE 1 1μM,PGE 2 100 nM) and EP 4 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 100nM). PGE 1 showed a higher calcium signal in EP 1 as compared to that of PGE 2 . In addition, there was a one log concentration difference between PGE 2 and PGE 1 for generation of calcium signal in EP 4 . The calcium signal indicated that the EP 1 is the likely dominant receptor in terms of signaling in tissues that co express the EPs. This study provides a molecular basis to understand the biological functions of PGE 1 and PGE 2 through their binding and signaling properties.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prostaglandin E 1 (PGE 1 ) and E 2 (PGE 2 ) are ligands for prostaglandin E 2 receptor (EP) family, which are designated as EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 and EP 4 . Interestingly, PGE 2 mediates inflammation whereas PGE 1 is acting as an anti‐inflammatory factor. However the molecular basis of their opposite actions on the EP receptors is poorly understood. In this study, the PGE 1 and PGE 2 binding affinity and signaling on the human recombinant EPs expressed in the live HEK293 stable cell lines were determined by [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding and the calcium and cyclic AMP signaling, respectively. The Kd of [ 3 H]PGE 2 binding to the EP 1 , EP 2 , EP 3 & EP 4 was 0.35 nM, 0.45 nM, 0.021 nM, and 0.047 nM, respectively. PGE 2 showed higher affinity or preference for EP 3 and EP 4 as compared to that of EP 1 and EP 2 . The IC50 thus calculated from [ 3 H]PGE 2 displacement experiments using cold PGE 1 and PGE 2 for the EPs is, EP 1 ( PGE 1 0.1mM, PGE 2 5μM), EP 2 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 1μM), EP 3 ( PGE 1 1μM,PGE 2 100 nM) and EP 4 ( PGE 1 1μM, PGE 2 100nM). PGE 1 showed a higher calcium signal in EP 1 as compared to that of PGE 2 . In addition, there was a one log concentration difference between PGE 2 and PGE 1 for generation of calcium signal in EP 4 . The calcium signal indicated that the EP 1 is the likely dominant receptor in terms of signaling in tissues that co express the EPs. This study provides a molecular basis to understand the biological functions of PGE 1 and PGE 2 through their binding and signaling properties.

Key concepts: Prostaglandin E, Receptor, Chemistry, Prostaglandin, Prostaglandin E2, Prostaglandin E2 receptor, Recombinant DNA, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Profile of prostaglandin E1 and E2 binding to four subtype prostaglandin E receptors — Research Paper | ScholarLens