2013Journal of financial transformationRequires access

The changing role of sovereign credit ratings

Simon Strong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The ongoing Eurozone crisis highlights the importance of sovereign credit ratings in determining a country’s ability to raise funds in the international capital markets. Sovereign credit ratings are published by credit rating agencies (CRAs), and the headline ratings come from the “big three” CRAs – Standard & Poors, Moody’s, and Fitch. Despite the central importance of sovereign credit ratings in the global economy, the process of determining these ratings is surprisingly subjective. As a result, central banks and regulators have criticized the role of CRAs in setting sovereign credit ratings and the effective oligopoly exercised by the big three firms. Proposals to reform the sovereign rating process range from increased regulation of CRAs on the one hand to removing their sovereign rating role altogether on the other hand. This paper examines the benefits and drawbacks of the current regime and the practical implications of changes in sovereign credit risk estimation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ongoing Eurozone crisis highlights the importance of sovereign credit ratings in determining a country’s ability to raise funds in the international capital markets. Sovereign credit ratings are published by credit rating agencies (CRAs), and the headline ratings come from the “big three” CRAs – Standard & Poors, Moody’s, and Fitch. Despite the central importance of sovereign credit ratings in the global economy, the process of determining these ratings is surprisingly subjective. As a result, central banks and regulators have criticized the role of CRAs in setting sovereign credit ratings and the effective oligopoly exercised by the big three firms. Proposals to reform the sovereign rating process range from increased regulation of CRAs on the one hand to removing their sovereign rating role altogether on the other hand. This paper examines the benefits and drawbacks of the current regime and the practical implications of changes in sovereign credit risk estimation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ongoing Eurozone crisis highlights the importance of sovereign credit ratings in determining a country’s ability to raise funds in the international capital markets. Sovereign credit ratings are published by credit rating agencies (CRAs), and the headline ratings come from the “big three” CRAs – Standard & Poors, Moody’s, and Fitch. Despite the central importance of sovereign credit ratings in the global economy, the process of determining these ratings is surprisingly subjective. As a result, central banks and regulators have criticized the role of CRAs in setting sovereign credit ratings and the effective oligopoly exercised by the big three firms. Proposals to reform the sovereign rating process range from increased regulation of CRAs on the one hand to removing their sovereign rating role altogether on the other hand. This paper examines the benefits and drawbacks of the current regime and the practical implications of changes in sovereign credit risk estimation.

Key concepts: Credit rating, Sovereign credit, Bond credit rating, Credit enhancement, Credit risk, Sovereignty, Financial system, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The changing role of sovereign credit ratings — Research Paper | ScholarLens