Salivary Cortisone Reflects Cortisol Exposure Under Physiological Conditions and After Hydrocortisone
Miguel Debono, Robert F. Harrison, Martin J. Whitaker, D.J.A. Eckland, Wiebke Arlt, Brian Keevil, Richard Ross
Abstract
Open-access reader
Miguel Debono, Robert F. Harrison, Martin J. Whitaker, D.J.A. Eckland, Wiebke Arlt, Brian Keevil, Richard Ross
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract Context: Measuring serum cortisol to evaluate stress, adrenal disease, and monitor hydrocortisone replacement requires venepuncture. Conversely, salivary measurements are noninvasive. Objective: This study aimed to investigate measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone as alternatives to serum cortisol. Design and Setting: This was a prospective cross-over study in a clinical research facility. Patients and Methods: Over three periods (Period 1, 24-h physiological cortisol rhythm; Periods 2 and 3, after 20 mg oral and iv hydrocortisone) 14 male volunteers had serum and saliva cortisol and cortisone, serum albumin, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol measured. Data were analyzed for rhythm parameters and correlations. Linear mixed-effects modelling was performed to determine the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisone. Results: Serum cortisol and cortisone showed similar circadian rhythms with large peak:trough ratios (cortisol median ratio, 11). Albumin and cortisol-binding globulin showed minor peak:trough ratios <1.2. When serum cortisol was <74 (SD, 29) nmol/L, salivary cortisol was not detectable but salivary cortisone was always detected. Salivary cortisol post-oral hydrocortisone produced spurious results due to contamination. Under physiological conditions, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.93; P < .001). Similarly, following iv or oral hydrocortisone, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.92; P < .001). A mixed-effects model showed that in this population 94% of the variation in salivary cortisone could be predicted from serum cortisol. Conclusion: Salivary cortisol is frequently undetectable and contaminated by oral hydrocortisone. In contrast, salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol and provides a noninvasive alternative to measuring serum cortisol levels.
OpenAlex reports 127 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Context: Measuring serum cortisol to evaluate stress, adrenal disease, and monitor hydrocortisone replacement requires venepuncture. Conversely, salivary measurements are noninvasive. Objective: This study aimed to investigate measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone as alternatives to serum cortisol. Design and Setting: This was a prospective cross-over study in a clinical research facility. Patients and Methods: Over three periods (Period 1, 24-h physiological cortisol rhythm; Periods 2 and 3, after 20 mg oral and iv hydrocortisone) 14 male volunteers had serum and saliva cortisol and cortisone, serum albumin, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol measured. Data were analyzed for rhythm parameters and correlations. Linear mixed-effects modelling was performed to determine the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisone. Results: Serum cortisol and cortisone showed similar circadian rhythms with large peak:trough ratios (cortisol median ratio, 11). Albumin and cortisol-binding globulin showed minor peak:trough ratios <1.2. When serum cortisol was <74 (SD, 29) nmol/L, salivary cortisol was not detectable but salivary cortisone was always detected. Salivary cortisol post-oral hydrocortisone produced spurious results due to contamination. Under physiological conditions, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.93; P < .001). Similarly, following iv or oral hydrocortisone, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.92; P < .001). A mixed-effects model showed that in this population 94% of the variation in salivary cortisone could be predicted from serum cortisol. Conclusion: Salivary cortisol is frequently undetectable and contaminated by oral hydrocortisone. In contrast, salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol and provides a noninvasive alternative to measuring serum cortisol levels.
Key concepts: Cortisone, Hydrocortisone, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Saliva, Medicine, Corticosteroid