2016The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismOpen access

Salivary Cortisone Reflects Cortisol Exposure Under Physiological Conditions and After Hydrocortisone

Miguel Debono, Robert F. Harrison, Martin J. Whitaker, D.J.A. Eckland, Wiebke Arlt, Brian Keevil, Richard Ross

Open full text 127 citations

Abstract

Abstract Context: Measuring serum cortisol to evaluate stress, adrenal disease, and monitor hydrocortisone replacement requires venepuncture. Conversely, salivary measurements are noninvasive. Objective: This study aimed to investigate measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone as alternatives to serum cortisol. Design and Setting: This was a prospective cross-over study in a clinical research facility. Patients and Methods: Over three periods (Period 1, 24-h physiological cortisol rhythm; Periods 2 and 3, after 20 mg oral and iv hydrocortisone) 14 male volunteers had serum and saliva cortisol and cortisone, serum albumin, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol measured. Data were analyzed for rhythm parameters and correlations. Linear mixed-effects modelling was performed to determine the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisone. Results: Serum cortisol and cortisone showed similar circadian rhythms with large peak:trough ratios (cortisol median ratio, 11). Albumin and cortisol-binding globulin showed minor peak:trough ratios <1.2. When serum cortisol was <74 (SD, 29) nmol/L, salivary cortisol was not detectable but salivary cortisone was always detected. Salivary cortisol post-oral hydrocortisone produced spurious results due to contamination. Under physiological conditions, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.93; P < .001). Similarly, following iv or oral hydrocortisone, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.92; P < .001). A mixed-effects model showed that in this population 94% of the variation in salivary cortisone could be predicted from serum cortisol. Conclusion: Salivary cortisol is frequently undetectable and contaminated by oral hydrocortisone. In contrast, salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol and provides a noninvasive alternative to measuring serum cortisol levels.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Context: Measuring serum cortisol to evaluate stress, adrenal disease, and monitor hydrocortisone replacement requires venepuncture. Conversely, salivary measurements are noninvasive. Objective: This study aimed to investigate measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone as alternatives to serum cortisol. Design and Setting: This was a prospective cross-over study in a clinical research facility. Patients and Methods: Over three periods (Period 1, 24-h physiological cortisol rhythm; Periods 2 and 3, after 20 mg oral and iv hydrocortisone) 14 male volunteers had serum and saliva cortisol and cortisone, serum albumin, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol measured. Data were analyzed for rhythm parameters and correlations. Linear mixed-effects modelling was performed to determine the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisone. Results: Serum cortisol and cortisone showed similar circadian rhythms with large peak:trough ratios (cortisol median ratio, 11). Albumin and cortisol-binding globulin showed minor peak:trough ratios <1.2. When serum cortisol was <74 (SD, 29) nmol/L, salivary cortisol was not detectable but salivary cortisone was always detected. Salivary cortisol post-oral hydrocortisone produced spurious results due to contamination. Under physiological conditions, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.93; P < .001). Similarly, following iv or oral hydrocortisone, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.92; P < .001). A mixed-effects model showed that in this population 94% of the variation in salivary cortisone could be predicted from serum cortisol. Conclusion: Salivary cortisol is frequently undetectable and contaminated by oral hydrocortisone. In contrast, salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol and provides a noninvasive alternative to measuring serum cortisol levels.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 127 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Context: Measuring serum cortisol to evaluate stress, adrenal disease, and monitor hydrocortisone replacement requires venepuncture. Conversely, salivary measurements are noninvasive. Objective: This study aimed to investigate measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone as alternatives to serum cortisol. Design and Setting: This was a prospective cross-over study in a clinical research facility. Patients and Methods: Over three periods (Period 1, 24-h physiological cortisol rhythm; Periods 2 and 3, after 20 mg oral and iv hydrocortisone) 14 male volunteers had serum and saliva cortisol and cortisone, serum albumin, cortisol-binding globulin, and free cortisol measured. Data were analyzed for rhythm parameters and correlations. Linear mixed-effects modelling was performed to determine the relationship between serum cortisol and salivary cortisone. Results: Serum cortisol and cortisone showed similar circadian rhythms with large peak:trough ratios (cortisol median ratio, 11). Albumin and cortisol-binding globulin showed minor peak:trough ratios <1.2. When serum cortisol was <74 (SD, 29) nmol/L, salivary cortisol was not detectable but salivary cortisone was always detected. Salivary cortisol post-oral hydrocortisone produced spurious results due to contamination. Under physiological conditions, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.93; P < .001). Similarly, following iv or oral hydrocortisone, salivary cortisone correlated strongly with serum cortisol (ρ, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.92; P < .001). A mixed-effects model showed that in this population 94% of the variation in salivary cortisone could be predicted from serum cortisol. Conclusion: Salivary cortisol is frequently undetectable and contaminated by oral hydrocortisone. In contrast, salivary cortisone reflects serum cortisol and provides a noninvasive alternative to measuring serum cortisol levels.

Key concepts: Cortisone, Hydrocortisone, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Saliva, Medicine, Corticosteroid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Salivary Cortisone Reflects Cortisol Exposure Under Physiological Conditions and After Hydrocortisone — Research Paper | ScholarLens