2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Intellectual Property Rights and the Political Economy in China and India

Alex Owen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Intellectual property rights have received sparse attention within the paradigm of Dependency Theory. This paper seeks to rectify this situation by analyzing the role intellectual property rights play in the economic and political relationship between the United States, China, and India. Economic data will be utilized to test whether there are statistically significant financial incentives that encourage a state adopt or resist stricter intellectual property regulations. The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) established under the Uruguay Round will be used as a benchmark in order to gain a more complete understanding of the Asian international intellectual property environment. It is hypothesized that as a country experiences sustained economic growth, it will have an incentive to adopt stronger intellectual property laws to foster the manufacture of intangible assets domestically.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Intellectual property rights have received sparse attention within the paradigm of Dependency Theory. This paper seeks to rectify this situation by analyzing the role intellectual property rights play in the economic and political relationship between the United States, China, and India. Economic data will be utilized to test whether there are statistically significant financial incentives that encourage a state adopt or resist stricter intellectual property regulations. The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) established under the Uruguay Round will be used as a benchmark in order to gain a more complete understanding of the Asian international intellectual property environment. It is hypothesized that as a country experiences sustained economic growth, it will have an incentive to adopt stronger intellectual property laws to foster the manufacture of intangible assets domestically.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Intellectual property rights have received sparse attention within the paradigm of Dependency Theory. This paper seeks to rectify this situation by analyzing the role intellectual property rights play in the economic and political relationship between the United States, China, and India. Economic data will be utilized to test whether there are statistically significant financial incentives that encourage a state adopt or resist stricter intellectual property regulations. The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) established under the Uruguay Round will be used as a benchmark in order to gain a more complete understanding of the Asian international intellectual property environment. It is hypothesized that as a country experiences sustained economic growth, it will have an incentive to adopt stronger intellectual property laws to foster the manufacture of intangible assets domestically.

Key concepts: Intellectual property, Incentive, TRIPS architecture, China, Politics, International trade, Intangible property, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intellectual Property Rights and the Political Economy in China and India — Research Paper | ScholarLens