2015•ScientometricsRequires access

A comparison of two ways of evaluating research units working in different scientific fields

Antonio Perianes‐Rodríguez, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Citation, Normalization (sociology), Citation impact, Computer science, Ranking (information retrieval), Publication, Raw data, Information retrieval

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

A comparison of two ways of evaluating research units working in different scientific fields — Research Paper | ScholarLens