1988Control, 1988. CONTROL 88., International Conference onRequires access

LQG auto-tuning

Richard William Jones

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A well known and accepted problem in optimal LQG (linear quadratic Gaussian) controller design is the choice of the quadratic cost function weights to produce desired or acceptable closed-loop characteristics. In this paper two simple methods of automatically designing (auto-tuning) the cost-function weights are introduced and discussed for a specific formulation of the discrete LQG control problem. The first method is only applicable to the control of simple systems where the most complex discrete process allowed is second order and the dynamic weights do not contain an integrator. The second method to be described is a simulation based method which determines a control weight from the simulated closed-loop response to a set-point change. Two performance objectives are investigated and these are given a physical interpretation therefore relating the control weight to a specific type of output performance. >

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A well known and accepted problem in optimal LQG (linear quadratic Gaussian) controller design is the choice of the quadratic cost function weights to produce desired or acceptable closed-loop characteristics. In this paper two simple methods of automatically designing (auto-tuning) the cost-function weights are introduced and discussed for a specific formulation of the discrete LQG control problem. The first method is only applicable to the control of simple systems where the most complex discrete process allowed is second order and the dynamic weights do not contain an integrator. The second method to be described is a simulation based method which determines a control weight from the simulated closed-loop response to a set-point change. Two performance objectives are investigated and these are given a physical interpretation therefore relating the control weight to a specific type of output performance. >

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A well known and accepted problem in optimal LQG (linear quadratic Gaussian) controller design is the choice of the quadratic cost function weights to produce desired or acceptable closed-loop characteristics. In this paper two simple methods of automatically designing (auto-tuning) the cost-function weights are introduced and discussed for a specific formulation of the discrete LQG control problem. The first method is only applicable to the control of simple systems where the most complex discrete process allowed is second order and the dynamic weights do not contain an integrator. The second method to be described is a simulation based method which determines a control weight from the simulated closed-loop response to a set-point change. Two performance objectives are investigated and these are given a physical interpretation therefore relating the control weight to a specific type of output performance. >

Key concepts: Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control, Control theory (sociology), Optimal projection equations, Integrator, Optimal control, Controller (irrigation), Linear-quadratic regulator, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LQG auto-tuning — Research Paper | ScholarLens