2005•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Abuse of Process and Wrongful Use of Civil Process

Grace M. Giesel

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A plaintiff, acting through his or her attorney, sues a defendant claiming that the defendant breached a contract or committed medical malpractice. Because the attorney has a lead role in the judicial system and the particular litigation, the defendant justly may develop a healthy dislike for the plaintiff's attorney. For the defendant, the plaintiff's attorney often is the embodiment of what the defendant feels is a bogus lawsuit. In addition, the zeal with which the plaintiff's attorney pursues the claim may cause the defendant to believe that the plaintiff's counsel is particularly evil. If the plaintiff's case ultimately fails, it is at least understandable that the defendant might want to take steps to get even. The torts of wrongful initiation of civil proceedings and abuse of process sit at the ready for such an aggrieved defendant. Lawyers should not live in fear of these torts, however, because they are extremely difficult to establish against anyone and especially against lawyers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A plaintiff, acting through his or her attorney, sues a defendant claiming that the defendant breached a contract or committed medical malpractice. Because the attorney has a lead role in the judicial system and the particular litigation, the defendant justly may develop a healthy dislike for the plaintiff's attorney. For the defendant, the plaintiff's attorney often is the embodiment of what the defendant feels is a bogus lawsuit. In addition, the zeal with which the plaintiff's attorney pursues the claim may cause the defendant to believe that the plaintiff's counsel is particularly evil. If the plaintiff's case ultimately fails, it is at least understandable that the defendant might want to take steps to get even. The torts of wrongful initiation of civil proceedings and abuse of process sit at the ready for such an aggrieved defendant. Lawyers should not live in fear of these torts, however, because they are extremely difficult to establish against anyone and especially against lawyers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A plaintiff, acting through his or her attorney, sues a defendant claiming that the defendant breached a contract or committed medical malpractice. Because the attorney has a lead role in the judicial system and the particular litigation, the defendant justly may develop a healthy dislike for the plaintiff's attorney. For the defendant, the plaintiff's attorney often is the embodiment of what the defendant feels is a bogus lawsuit. In addition, the zeal with which the plaintiff's attorney pursues the claim may cause the defendant to believe that the plaintiff's counsel is particularly evil. If the plaintiff's case ultimately fails, it is at least understandable that the defendant might want to take steps to get even. The torts of wrongful initiation of civil proceedings and abuse of process sit at the ready for such an aggrieved defendant. Lawyers should not live in fear of these torts, however, because they are extremely difficult to establish against anyone and especially against lawyers.

Key concepts: Plaintiff, Lawsuit, Law, Medical malpractice, Malpractice, Defense attorney, Political science, Legal process

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abuse of Process and Wrongful Use of Civil Process — Research Paper | ScholarLens