Conflito ou autorrecriminação: Questões sobre o desejo na neurose
Lenita Pacheco Lemos Duarte
Abstract
Lenita Pacheco Lemos Duarte
Abstract
Freud aims to enlighten the etiology of neurosis making differences of kinds of experienced enjoyment in the first meeting with sex, comparing the hysteria with obssesive neurosis. He destinguishes the conflict in hysteria, presuming an experience of unpleasure and self-recrimination in the obsessive neurosis and consequently guilt because of a prohibited experience. The clinical types are different in terms of desire, as it is an unconscious subject. Profiles of the clinic show issues of hysteria about sex and the existence for the obsessive.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Freud aims to enlighten the etiology of neurosis making differences of kinds of experienced enjoyment in the first meeting with sex, comparing the hysteria with obssesive neurosis. He destinguishes the conflict in hysteria, presuming an experience of unpleasure and self-recrimination in the obsessive neurosis and consequently guilt because of a prohibited experience. The clinical types are different in terms of desire, as it is an unconscious subject. Profiles of the clinic show issues of hysteria about sex and the existence for the obsessive.
Key concepts: Hysteria, Neurosis, Psychoanalysis, Subject (documents), Unconscious mind, Psychology, Philosophy, Computer science