2007•DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University)Requires access

Soviet and Eastern bloc Marxism

Mark Sandle

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

As the first socialist state, dedicated to the construction of a communist society, the USSR offers some unusual and fascinating perspectives on the history of Marxism, as does Eastern Europe. The Soviet state devoted a huge amount of time, resources, energy and words to the development, production, dissemination and propagation of Marxism Soviet-style. Is there an identifiable Soviet Marxist canon? What, if anything, did this massive effort contribute to the development of Marxist thought in general? In political terms, the self-identification of the Soviet state as an entity guided by, or better perhaps armed with, Marxism-Leninism, coupled with the troubled history of the USSR, has significantly shaped popular perceptions of the effects of Marxism when in power. How accurate is it to see Soviet Marxism as a sterile, dogmatic, monolithic, uncritical body of doctrine designed to rationalise the oppressive rule of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union)? Finally, the Soviet case provides an interesting example of the shift from revolutionary doctrine to ruling ideology which Soviet Marxism underwent after 1924. How did this change impact upon Soviet Marxism?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As the first socialist state, dedicated to the construction of a communist society, the USSR offers some unusual and fascinating perspectives on the history of Marxism, as does Eastern Europe. The Soviet state devoted a huge amount of time, resources, energy and words to the development, production, dissemination and propagation of Marxism Soviet-style. Is there an identifiable Soviet Marxist canon? What, if anything, did this massive effort contribute to the development of Marxist thought in general? In political terms, the self-identification of the Soviet state as an entity guided by, or better perhaps armed with, Marxism-Leninism, coupled with the troubled history of the USSR, has significantly shaped popular perceptions of the effects of Marxism when in power. How accurate is it to see Soviet Marxism as a sterile, dogmatic, monolithic, uncritical body of doctrine designed to rationalise the oppressive rule of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union)? Finally, the Soviet case provides an interesting example of the shift from revolutionary doctrine to ruling ideology which Soviet Marxism underwent after 1924. How did this change impact upon Soviet Marxism?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As the first socialist state, dedicated to the construction of a communist society, the USSR offers some unusual and fascinating perspectives on the history of Marxism, as does Eastern Europe. The Soviet state devoted a huge amount of time, resources, energy and words to the development, production, dissemination and propagation of Marxism Soviet-style. Is there an identifiable Soviet Marxist canon? What, if anything, did this massive effort contribute to the development of Marxist thought in general? In political terms, the self-identification of the Soviet state as an entity guided by, or better perhaps armed with, Marxism-Leninism, coupled with the troubled history of the USSR, has significantly shaped popular perceptions of the effects of Marxism when in power. How accurate is it to see Soviet Marxism as a sterile, dogmatic, monolithic, uncritical body of doctrine designed to rationalise the oppressive rule of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union)? Finally, the Soviet case provides an interesting example of the shift from revolutionary doctrine to ruling ideology which Soviet Marxism underwent after 1924. How did this change impact upon Soviet Marxism?

Key concepts: Communism, Marxist philosophy, Ideology, Doctrine, Soviet union, State (computer science), Political science, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Soviet and Eastern bloc Marxism — Research Paper | ScholarLens