2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

Assessing Construct Validity: The Utility of Factor Analysis

Cheng-Hsiung Lu

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

According to validity standards of American Psychological Association in 1954, four types of validity were identified for accomplishing different aims of research, namely content validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. For the justification of the construct validity, this study utilizes exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to examine factors of the empirical data. Through the operation of the empirical data analysis, important results are accordingly illustrated by the exploratory factor analysis such as factor loading, the rotated simple structure, the plot of scree test; also by the confirmatory factor analysis such as specifying a priori factor pattern, and indices for goodness of model fit. Consequently, the obtained solutions from the factor analysis procedures provide reasonable justification to construct validity of the researched.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to validity standards of American Psychological Association in 1954, four types of validity were identified for accomplishing different aims of research, namely content validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. For the justification of the construct validity, this study utilizes exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to examine factors of the empirical data. Through the operation of the empirical data analysis, important results are accordingly illustrated by the exploratory factor analysis such as factor loading, the rotated simple structure, the plot of scree test; also by the confirmatory factor analysis such as specifying a priori factor pattern, and indices for goodness of model fit. Consequently, the obtained solutions from the factor analysis procedures provide reasonable justification to construct validity of the researched.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to validity standards of American Psychological Association in 1954, four types of validity were identified for accomplishing different aims of research, namely content validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. For the justification of the construct validity, this study utilizes exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to examine factors of the empirical data. Through the operation of the empirical data analysis, important results are accordingly illustrated by the exploratory factor analysis such as factor loading, the rotated simple structure, the plot of scree test; also by the confirmatory factor analysis such as specifying a priori factor pattern, and indices for goodness of model fit. Consequently, the obtained solutions from the factor analysis procedures provide reasonable justification to construct validity of the researched.

Key concepts: Construct validity, Confirmatory factor analysis, Concurrent validity, Exploratory factor analysis, Goodness of fit, Construct (python library), Predictive validity, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing Construct Validity: The Utility of Factor Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens