2012•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

ADB Forum on the Use of Capital Controls

Jonathan David Ostry, Maria Socorro Gochoco‐Bautista, Changyong Rhee, Michael M. Hutchison, Chalongphob Sussangkarn, Eli M. Remolona, Masahiro Kawai

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Widespread liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s enabled the freer movement of capital across international borders. Alongside large and often volatile movements in capital flows, risks to macro stability and the health of the financial system have led many countries to reconsider the wisdom of continuing to allow unimpeded flows of capital. Asia’s strong recovery in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 as well as continuing problems in the EU presage even larger flows of capital to Asia. This has led to a rethinking about the wisdom of unfettered cross-border capital flows and ways to manage capital flows, including the potential usefulness of capital controls.The ADB Forum on the Use of Capital Controls held on 14 July 2011 examined the context in which such controls could be useful as part of a broader menu of tools in the policymaker’s toolkit as well as the experiences of selected Asian countries in using de jure capital controls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Widespread liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s enabled the freer movement of capital across international borders. Alongside large and often volatile movements in capital flows, risks to macro stability and the health of the financial system have led many countries to reconsider the wisdom of continuing to allow unimpeded flows of capital. Asia’s strong recovery in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 as well as continuing problems in the EU presage even larger flows of capital to Asia. This has led to a rethinking about the wisdom of unfettered cross-border capital flows and ways to manage capital flows, including the potential usefulness of capital controls.The ADB Forum on the Use of Capital Controls held on 14 July 2011 examined the context in which such controls could be useful as part of a broader menu of tools in the policymaker’s toolkit as well as the experiences of selected Asian countries in using de jure capital controls.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Widespread liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s enabled the freer movement of capital across international borders. Alongside large and often volatile movements in capital flows, risks to macro stability and the health of the financial system have led many countries to reconsider the wisdom of continuing to allow unimpeded flows of capital. Asia’s strong recovery in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 as well as continuing problems in the EU presage even larger flows of capital to Asia. This has led to a rethinking about the wisdom of unfettered cross-border capital flows and ways to manage capital flows, including the potential usefulness of capital controls.The ADB Forum on the Use of Capital Controls held on 14 July 2011 examined the context in which such controls could be useful as part of a broader menu of tools in the policymaker’s toolkit as well as the experiences of selected Asian countries in using de jure capital controls.

Key concepts: Capital (architecture), Capital flows, Context (archaeology), Financial capital, Capital control, Economic capital, Capital formation, Capital account

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ADB Forum on the Use of Capital Controls — Research Paper | ScholarLens