Constitutional Justice and Constitutional Politics in France : Policy Arguments in the Case Law of the Constitutional Council
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
The French version of this paper can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177832In many decisions from the French constitutional court (Conseil constitutionnel), reason-giving is limited to a minimum, if not altogether absent. this articles aims at understanding this practice of weak reason-giving by showing that it displays a special understanding of politics. The French constitutional council does not, contrary to a widespread belief, ignore politics. Rather, it has a special way of dealing with policy arguments in what appears to be a mainly deductive approach to adjudication.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The French version of this paper can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177832In many decisions from the French constitutional court (Conseil constitutionnel), reason-giving is limited to a minimum, if not altogether absent. this articles aims at understanding this practice of weak reason-giving by showing that it displays a special understanding of politics. The French constitutional council does not, contrary to a widespread belief, ignore politics. Rather, it has a special way of dealing with policy arguments in what appears to be a mainly deductive approach to adjudication.
Key concepts: Law, Constitutional economics, Political science, Politics, Constitutional law, Economic Justice, Constitutional court, Constitutional review