2012重症醫學雜誌Requires access

Predictive Value in Receiving Early Unilateral Decompressive Craniectomy or Craniotomy in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Kao‐Chang Lin, Chong-Jeh Lo, Che-Chuan Wang, Chung‐Ching Chio, Jinn‐Rung Kuo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who underwent unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC) or craniotomy were evaluated.Method: A retrospective cohort with standard neurosurgical approach over a 4.5 year period was performed (46 craniectomy and 36 craniotomy). Several variables were recorded and characteristic of patients receiving craniectomy or craniotomy was compared. Using multivariate logistic regression and prognostic scoring models, Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 6 months after TBI.Results: Our data showed craniectomy group had a lower pre-operative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p = 0.012), unresponsive pupil reaction (p = 0.013), lower intracranial cerebral pressure (p = 0.001), cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.011) and cerebral circulatory-pressure index (p < 0.001), but with higher post-operative cerebral infarction (p = 0.037) than craniotomy group. The favorable outcome in craniectomy group was 32.6%. Age (p = 0.06), pre-operative pupil reaction (p = 0.03), and pre-operative GCS (p = 0.04) were three independent predictors to poor outcome and ROC curve demonstrated its sensitivity 90.3% and specificity 88.2%.Conclusion: Although a small population in single medical center was enrolled, it evidenced the pre-operative neurological status was prognostic dependent. How to use aforementioned predictors before decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy to get a better outcome is still a challenge in daily practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: The outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who underwent unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC) or craniotomy were evaluated.Method: A retrospective cohort with standard neurosurgical approach over a 4.5 year period was performed (46 craniectomy and 36 craniotomy). Several variables were recorded and characteristic of patients receiving craniectomy or craniotomy was compared. Using multivariate logistic regression and prognostic scoring models, Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 6 months after TBI.Results: Our data showed craniectomy group had a lower pre-operative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p = 0.012), unresponsive pupil reaction (p = 0.013), lower intracranial cerebral pressure (p = 0.001), cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.011) and cerebral circulatory-pressure index (p < 0.001), but with higher post-operative cerebral infarction (p = 0.037) than craniotomy group. The favorable outcome in craniectomy group was 32.6%. Age (p = 0.06), pre-operative pupil reaction (p = 0.03), and pre-operative GCS (p = 0.04) were three independent predictors to poor outcome and ROC curve demonstrated its sensitivity 90.3% and specificity 88.2%.Conclusion: Although a small population in single medical center was enrolled, it evidenced the pre-operative neurological status was prognostic dependent. How to use aforementioned predictors before decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy to get a better outcome is still a challenge in daily practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: The outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who underwent unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC) or craniotomy were evaluated.Method: A retrospective cohort with standard neurosurgical approach over a 4.5 year period was performed (46 craniectomy and 36 craniotomy). Several variables were recorded and characteristic of patients receiving craniectomy or craniotomy was compared. Using multivariate logistic regression and prognostic scoring models, Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 6 months after TBI.Results: Our data showed craniectomy group had a lower pre-operative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p = 0.012), unresponsive pupil reaction (p = 0.013), lower intracranial cerebral pressure (p = 0.001), cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.011) and cerebral circulatory-pressure index (p < 0.001), but with higher post-operative cerebral infarction (p = 0.037) than craniotomy group. The favorable outcome in craniectomy group was 32.6%. Age (p = 0.06), pre-operative pupil reaction (p = 0.03), and pre-operative GCS (p = 0.04) were three independent predictors to poor outcome and ROC curve demonstrated its sensitivity 90.3% and specificity 88.2%.Conclusion: Although a small population in single medical center was enrolled, it evidenced the pre-operative neurological status was prognostic dependent. How to use aforementioned predictors before decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy to get a better outcome is still a challenge in daily practice.

Key concepts: Craniotomy, Decompressive craniectomy, Medicine, Glasgow Coma Scale, Traumatic brain injury, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Intracranial pressure, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predictive Value in Receiving Early Unilateral Decompressive Craniectomy or Craniotomy in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens