2012Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Instructing the Jury

Nancy S. Marder

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the American legal system, a defendant in a serious criminal case and parties in certain types of civil cases are entitled to a trial by jury. In both criminal and civil jury trials, jurors are drawn from a ‘fair-cross-section’ of the community. Although they are usually untrained in the law, jurors provide the ‘common-sense judgment’ of the community. At the end of a jury trial, whether in a civil or criminal case, the judge instructs the jury on the relevant law. The jury is supposed to use the jury instructions in the course of its deliberations, although much of the empirical and anecdotal evidence suggests that juries have difficulty understanding these instructions. This article examines why jury instructions are so difficult to grasp, and what steps judges and committees can take to make them more accessible to jurors. After discussing the language of the instructions, it looks at how the instructions are presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In the American legal system, a defendant in a serious criminal case and parties in certain types of civil cases are entitled to a trial by jury. In both criminal and civil jury trials, jurors are drawn from a ‘fair-cross-section’ of the community. Although they are usually untrained in the law, jurors provide the ‘common-sense judgment’ of the community. At the end of a jury trial, whether in a civil or criminal case, the judge instructs the jury on the relevant law. The jury is supposed to use the jury instructions in the course of its deliberations, although much of the empirical and anecdotal evidence suggests that juries have difficulty understanding these instructions. This article examines why jury instructions are so difficult to grasp, and what steps judges and committees can take to make them more accessible to jurors. After discussing the language of the instructions, it looks at how the instructions are presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In the American legal system, a defendant in a serious criminal case and parties in certain types of civil cases are entitled to a trial by jury. In both criminal and civil jury trials, jurors are drawn from a ‘fair-cross-section’ of the community. Although they are usually untrained in the law, jurors provide the ‘common-sense judgment’ of the community. At the end of a jury trial, whether in a civil or criminal case, the judge instructs the jury on the relevant law. The jury is supposed to use the jury instructions in the course of its deliberations, although much of the empirical and anecdotal evidence suggests that juries have difficulty understanding these instructions. This article examines why jury instructions are so difficult to grasp, and what steps judges and committees can take to make them more accessible to jurors. After discussing the language of the instructions, it looks at how the instructions are presented.

Key concepts: Jury, Jury instructions, Hung jury, Law, Jury trial, Psychology, Criminal case, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Instructing the Jury — Research Paper | ScholarLens