2009Harvard University Press eBooksRequires access

The Costs of Unemployment

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The unemployment rate has been consistently above 5 per cent in Australia since the first oil shock in the early 1970s. The current Coalition Government and the previous Labor Government have not pursued efficient employment policies. Further the persistently high unemployment has imposed an unequal burden across members of Australian society. Consequently the unemployment rate cannot be construed as the optimal outcome of the pursuit of a collective goal, such as low inflation. In this paper Martin Watts and William Mitchell demonstrate that the measurable costs of the sustained high rate of unemployment in Australia are substantially higher than the alleged gains from neo-liberal (microeconomic) reforms. In addition, significant individual and social costs can be identified. Consequently macroeconomic intervention to reduce unemployment should be viewed as a priority, rather than the imposition of market reform with its uncertain impact.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The unemployment rate has been consistently above 5 per cent in Australia since the first oil shock in the early 1970s. The current Coalition Government and the previous Labor Government have not pursued efficient employment policies. Further the persistently high unemployment has imposed an unequal burden across members of Australian society. Consequently the unemployment rate cannot be construed as the optimal outcome of the pursuit of a collective goal, such as low inflation. In this paper Martin Watts and William Mitchell demonstrate that the measurable costs of the sustained high rate of unemployment in Australia are substantially higher than the alleged gains from neo-liberal (microeconomic) reforms. In addition, significant individual and social costs can be identified. Consequently macroeconomic intervention to reduce unemployment should be viewed as a priority, rather than the imposition of market reform with its uncertain impact.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The unemployment rate has been consistently above 5 per cent in Australia since the first oil shock in the early 1970s. The current Coalition Government and the previous Labor Government have not pursued efficient employment policies. Further the persistently high unemployment has imposed an unequal burden across members of Australian society. Consequently the unemployment rate cannot be construed as the optimal outcome of the pursuit of a collective goal, such as low inflation. In this paper Martin Watts and William Mitchell demonstrate that the measurable costs of the sustained high rate of unemployment in Australia are substantially higher than the alleged gains from neo-liberal (microeconomic) reforms. In addition, significant individual and social costs can be identified. Consequently macroeconomic intervention to reduce unemployment should be viewed as a priority, rather than the imposition of market reform with its uncertain impact.

Key concepts: Unemployment, Economics, Labour economics, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Costs of Unemployment — Research Paper | ScholarLens