2014European Respiratory JournalRequires access

Benefits of a reservoir nasal cannula (oxymizer) versus a conventional nasal cannula during exercise in hypoxemic COPD patients

Rainer Gloeckl, Maximilian Matthaei, Inga Heinzelmann, Stella Seeberg, Thomas Damisch, B Sczepanski, Sandra Winterkamp, Andreas Jerrentrup, Claus Vogelmeier, Klaus Kenn

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The Oxymizer ® device is a special oxygen nasal cannula that provides a higher luminal diameter in combination with an incorporated oxygen reservoir. Thus it is assumed that a higher oxygen content can be delivered in order to increase oxygenation. Methods: Aim of this prospective cross-over study was to investigate the effects of the Oxymizer ® in comparison to a conventional nasal cannula (CNC). N=43 patients with severe COPD (age: 60±9y, FEV 1 : 37±16% pred.) and indication for long-term oxygen therapy were recruited during pulmonary rehabilitation. After an initial incremental cycle test patients performed 4 constant cycling work rate tests (CWRT) at 70% of their peak work rate (twice with Oxymizer ® and twice with CNC in random order). Results: Endurance time was significantly higher when patients cycled using Oxymizer ® in comparison to CNC (858±754 sec. vs 766±652 sec.; p<0.01). Beside of a longer cycling duration, PaO 2 values at the end of CWRT were also significantly higher with Oxymizer ® (65±11 mmHg versus 62±10 mmHg; p<0.001). However, in a subgroup analysis we found that patients with an oxygen supplementation of ≥4 liters/min obtained an markedly higher increase in exercise capacity by using the Oxymizer ® than patients with lower oxygen flow rates (increase in endurance time 161±225 sec. versus 20±123 sec.; p<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that oxygen delivery via Oxymizer ® is superior to CNC with regards to endurance capacity and a better oxygenation during exercise in patients with severe COPD. It seems that especially patients with high oxygen flow rates of ≥4 liters/min benefit most from the use of an Oxymizer ® .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The Oxymizer ® device is a special oxygen nasal cannula that provides a higher luminal diameter in combination with an incorporated oxygen reservoir. Thus it is assumed that a higher oxygen content can be delivered in order to increase oxygenation. Methods: Aim of this prospective cross-over study was to investigate the effects of the Oxymizer ® in comparison to a conventional nasal cannula (CNC). N=43 patients with severe COPD (age: 60±9y, FEV 1 : 37±16% pred.) and indication for long-term oxygen therapy were recruited during pulmonary rehabilitation. After an initial incremental cycle test patients performed 4 constant cycling work rate tests (CWRT) at 70% of their peak work rate (twice with Oxymizer ® and twice with CNC in random order). Results: Endurance time was significantly higher when patients cycled using Oxymizer ® in comparison to CNC (858±754 sec. vs 766±652 sec.; p<0.01). Beside of a longer cycling duration, PaO 2 values at the end of CWRT were also significantly higher with Oxymizer ® (65±11 mmHg versus 62±10 mmHg; p<0.001). However, in a subgroup analysis we found that patients with an oxygen supplementation of ≥4 liters/min obtained an markedly higher increase in exercise capacity by using the Oxymizer ® than patients with lower oxygen flow rates (increase in endurance time 161±225 sec. versus 20±123 sec.; p<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that oxygen delivery via Oxymizer ® is superior to CNC with regards to endurance capacity and a better oxygenation during exercise in patients with severe COPD. It seems that especially patients with high oxygen flow rates of ≥4 liters/min benefit most from the use of an Oxymizer ® .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The Oxymizer ® device is a special oxygen nasal cannula that provides a higher luminal diameter in combination with an incorporated oxygen reservoir. Thus it is assumed that a higher oxygen content can be delivered in order to increase oxygenation. Methods: Aim of this prospective cross-over study was to investigate the effects of the Oxymizer ® in comparison to a conventional nasal cannula (CNC). N=43 patients with severe COPD (age: 60±9y, FEV 1 : 37±16% pred.) and indication for long-term oxygen therapy were recruited during pulmonary rehabilitation. After an initial incremental cycle test patients performed 4 constant cycling work rate tests (CWRT) at 70% of their peak work rate (twice with Oxymizer ® and twice with CNC in random order). Results: Endurance time was significantly higher when patients cycled using Oxymizer ® in comparison to CNC (858±754 sec. vs 766±652 sec.; p<0.01). Beside of a longer cycling duration, PaO 2 values at the end of CWRT were also significantly higher with Oxymizer ® (65±11 mmHg versus 62±10 mmHg; p<0.001). However, in a subgroup analysis we found that patients with an oxygen supplementation of ≥4 liters/min obtained an markedly higher increase in exercise capacity by using the Oxymizer ® than patients with lower oxygen flow rates (increase in endurance time 161±225 sec. versus 20±123 sec.; p<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that oxygen delivery via Oxymizer ® is superior to CNC with regards to endurance capacity and a better oxygenation during exercise in patients with severe COPD. It seems that especially patients with high oxygen flow rates of ≥4 liters/min benefit most from the use of an Oxymizer ® .

Key concepts: Nasal cannula, Medicine, Cannula, COPD, Oxygenation, Oxygen delivery, Oxygen therapy, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Benefits of a reservoir nasal cannula (oxymizer) versus a conventional nasal cannula during exercise in hypoxemic COPD patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens