2009Journal of Plant Disease SciencesRequires access

Bioassay of Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) against leaf eating caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner).

RW Ingle, G. Jayaraman, V. V. Deshmukh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Pathogenic ability studies of five different isolates of Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) was carried out against the leaf eating caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). The LC50 values of isolates Ma PDBC, Ma-IIHR, Ma-TNAU, Ma-AKL and Ma-ITCC on topical application of fungal spore suspension were 4.64×105 7.03×l05, 3.19×106, 6.73×l06 and 8.62×l06 spores ml−1, respectively; onleaf dip method were 1.33×l06. 8.68×l06, 2.93×l07, 5.03×l07 and 7.93×l07 spores ml−1, respectively; and on both topical application and leaf dip method were 1.88×l04, 6.64×l04, 1.39×l05, 5.54×l06 and 7.62×l05 spores ml−1, respectively. The LC50 values of five different isolates were varied with virulence of isolates and also with spore concentrations. Ma-PDBC was found most virulent, followed by Ma IIHK and Ma-TNAU where as Ma-ITCC and Ma-AKL was found less virulent. Combination of topical application and leaf dip method was found effective for pathogenicity test followed by topical application method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pathogenic ability studies of five different isolates of Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) was carried out against the leaf eating caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). The LC50 values of isolates Ma PDBC, Ma-IIHR, Ma-TNAU, Ma-AKL and Ma-ITCC on topical application of fungal spore suspension were 4.64×105 7.03×l05, 3.19×106, 6.73×l06 and 8.62×l06 spores ml−1, respectively; onleaf dip method were 1.33×l06. 8.68×l06, 2.93×l07, 5.03×l07 and 7.93×l07 spores ml−1, respectively; and on both topical application and leaf dip method were 1.88×l04, 6.64×l04, 1.39×l05, 5.54×l06 and 7.62×l05 spores ml−1, respectively. The LC50 values of five different isolates were varied with virulence of isolates and also with spore concentrations. Ma-PDBC was found most virulent, followed by Ma IIHK and Ma-TNAU where as Ma-ITCC and Ma-AKL was found less virulent. Combination of topical application and leaf dip method was found effective for pathogenicity test followed by topical application method.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pathogenic ability studies of five different isolates of Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) was carried out against the leaf eating caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). The LC50 values of isolates Ma PDBC, Ma-IIHR, Ma-TNAU, Ma-AKL and Ma-ITCC on topical application of fungal spore suspension were 4.64×105 7.03×l05, 3.19×106, 6.73×l06 and 8.62×l06 spores ml−1, respectively; onleaf dip method were 1.33×l06. 8.68×l06, 2.93×l07, 5.03×l07 and 7.93×l07 spores ml−1, respectively; and on both topical application and leaf dip method were 1.88×l04, 6.64×l04, 1.39×l05, 5.54×l06 and 7.62×l05 spores ml−1, respectively. The LC50 values of five different isolates were varied with virulence of isolates and also with spore concentrations. Ma-PDBC was found most virulent, followed by Ma IIHK and Ma-TNAU where as Ma-ITCC and Ma-AKL was found less virulent. Combination of topical application and leaf dip method was found effective for pathogenicity test followed by topical application method.

Key concepts: Helicoverpa armigera, Spore, Caterpillar, Virulence, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Bioassay, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioassay of Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) against leaf eating caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). — Research Paper | ScholarLens