Допрос подсудимого в системе процессуальных средств защиты от обвинения: разумный компромисс
А. В. Хомякова
Abstract
А. В. Хомякова
Abstract
The article presents the historical and comparative analysis of Russian and foreign procedural orders interrogation of the defendant at trial. The main content of the study is the value of the testimony of the defendant as a procedural means of protection against prosecution. We consider the combination of features of different types of criminal procedure, which is characterized by the participation of the defendant in the court proceedings. Suggestions to amend the criminal procedure law, make effective use of the interrogation of the defendant, while ensuring their right to protection.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article presents the historical and comparative analysis of Russian and foreign procedural orders interrogation of the defendant at trial. The main content of the study is the value of the testimony of the defendant as a procedural means of protection against prosecution. We consider the combination of features of different types of criminal procedure, which is characterized by the participation of the defendant in the court proceedings. Suggestions to amend the criminal procedure law, make effective use of the interrogation of the defendant, while ensuring their right to protection.
Key concepts: Interrogation, Procedural law, Criminal procedure, Law, Political science, Value (mathematics), Criminal investigation, Criminal trial