2014Terra EconomicusRequires access

Допрос подсудимого в системе процессуальных средств защиты от обвинения: разумный компромисс

А. В. Хомякова

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The article presents the historical and comparative analysis of Russian and foreign procedural orders interrogation of the defendant at trial. The main content of the study is the value of the testimony of the defendant as a procedural means of protection against prosecution. We consider the combination of features of different types of criminal procedure, which is characterized by the participation of the defendant in the court proceedings. Suggestions to amend the criminal procedure law, make effective use of the interrogation of the defendant, while ensuring their right to protection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article presents the historical and comparative analysis of Russian and foreign procedural orders interrogation of the defendant at trial. The main content of the study is the value of the testimony of the defendant as a procedural means of protection against prosecution. We consider the combination of features of different types of criminal procedure, which is characterized by the participation of the defendant in the court proceedings. Suggestions to amend the criminal procedure law, make effective use of the interrogation of the defendant, while ensuring their right to protection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article presents the historical and comparative analysis of Russian and foreign procedural orders interrogation of the defendant at trial. The main content of the study is the value of the testimony of the defendant as a procedural means of protection against prosecution. We consider the combination of features of different types of criminal procedure, which is characterized by the participation of the defendant in the court proceedings. Suggestions to amend the criminal procedure law, make effective use of the interrogation of the defendant, while ensuring their right to protection.

Key concepts: Interrogation, Procedural law, Criminal procedure, Law, Political science, Value (mathematics), Criminal investigation, Criminal trial

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Допрос подсудимого в системе процессуальных средств защиты от обвинения: разумный компромисс — Research Paper | ScholarLens