2010中華民國大腸直腸外科醫學會雜誌Requires access

The Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Influence of Fecal Diversion after Resection of Rectal Cancer

TE-CHENG YUEH, Shih‐Ching Chang, Tzu‐Chen Lin, Wei-Chone Chen, Jeng‐Kai Jiang, Shung-Haur Yang, Huann‐Sheng Wang, Yuan‐Tzu Lan, Jen‐Kou Lin

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose. The most important surgical complication following rectal resection with anastomosis is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. This study investigated factors in anastomotic leakage and the effect of fecal diversion after resection of middle and low rectal cancers. Methods. Prospective data collection from patients with rectal cancer at 16 cm or less from anal verge was reviewed and risk factors of anastomosis investigated. The relationship between anastomotic leakage and clinicopathologic variables was determined using logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was done to determine independent factors of anastomotic leakage. Results. From January 1993 to June 2003, 999 rectal cancer patients received elective radical resection and anastomosis. Fifty-three of these patients experienced anastomotic leakage. Univariable analysis revealed that age >70 years old (P=0.008), tumor location between 6-12 cm (P=0.026), and surgery with ultra-LAR (P=0.002) were significantly associated with increased anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis showed only older patients (P=0.009) and operation method (P=0.002) were independent factors for the development of anastomotic leakage; tumor of the middle rectum (6-12 cm) had borderline significance (P=0.078). Thirty percent (n=3/10) of patients with diverting stoma and 100% (n=43/43) of patients without diverting stoma needed reoperation to treat abdominal sepsis. Conclusion. Older rectal cancer patients, or those who have had anastomosis at the anorectal junction or dentate line, have increased risk of anastomotic leakage. A diverting stoma seems not to decrease incidence of anastomotic leakage, but may decrease the necessity of reoperation and provide a positive oncological impact if leakage occurs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose. The most important surgical complication following rectal resection with anastomosis is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. This study investigated factors in anastomotic leakage and the effect of fecal diversion after resection of middle and low rectal cancers. Methods. Prospective data collection from patients with rectal cancer at 16 cm or less from anal verge was reviewed and risk factors of anastomosis investigated. The relationship between anastomotic leakage and clinicopathologic variables was determined using logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was done to determine independent factors of anastomotic leakage. Results. From January 1993 to June 2003, 999 rectal cancer patients received elective radical resection and anastomosis. Fifty-three of these patients experienced anastomotic leakage. Univariable analysis revealed that age >70 years old (P=0.008), tumor location between 6-12 cm (P=0.026), and surgery with ultra-LAR (P=0.002) were significantly associated with increased anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis showed only older patients (P=0.009) and operation method (P=0.002) were independent factors for the development of anastomotic leakage; tumor of the middle rectum (6-12 cm) had borderline significance (P=0.078). Thirty percent (n=3/10) of patients with diverting stoma and 100% (n=43/43) of patients without diverting stoma needed reoperation to treat abdominal sepsis. Conclusion. Older rectal cancer patients, or those who have had anastomosis at the anorectal junction or dentate line, have increased risk of anastomotic leakage. A diverting stoma seems not to decrease incidence of anastomotic leakage, but may decrease the necessity of reoperation and provide a positive oncological impact if leakage occurs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose. The most important surgical complication following rectal resection with anastomosis is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. This study investigated factors in anastomotic leakage and the effect of fecal diversion after resection of middle and low rectal cancers. Methods. Prospective data collection from patients with rectal cancer at 16 cm or less from anal verge was reviewed and risk factors of anastomosis investigated. The relationship between anastomotic leakage and clinicopathologic variables was determined using logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model was done to determine independent factors of anastomotic leakage. Results. From January 1993 to June 2003, 999 rectal cancer patients received elective radical resection and anastomosis. Fifty-three of these patients experienced anastomotic leakage. Univariable analysis revealed that age >70 years old (P=0.008), tumor location between 6-12 cm (P=0.026), and surgery with ultra-LAR (P=0.002) were significantly associated with increased anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis showed only older patients (P=0.009) and operation method (P=0.002) were independent factors for the development of anastomotic leakage; tumor of the middle rectum (6-12 cm) had borderline significance (P=0.078). Thirty percent (n=3/10) of patients with diverting stoma and 100% (n=43/43) of patients without diverting stoma needed reoperation to treat abdominal sepsis. Conclusion. Older rectal cancer patients, or those who have had anastomosis at the anorectal junction or dentate line, have increased risk of anastomotic leakage. A diverting stoma seems not to decrease incidence of anastomotic leakage, but may decrease the necessity of reoperation and provide a positive oncological impact if leakage occurs.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anastomosis, Colorectal cancer, Surgery, Rectum, Colorectal surgery, Complication, Logistic regression

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Influence of Fecal Diversion after Resection of Rectal Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens