2001Fire Safety ScienceRequires access

Fallacies And Facts In Design For Fire Resistance

Andrew Buchanan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper exposes a number of fallacies about fire resistance in buildings. Much of the conventional wisdom is incorrect. By examining these fallacies, the paper asserts that there is a legitimate role for fire resisting elements in any building fire safety strategy, despite increasing reliance being placed on sprinklers and other active fire protection systems. The paper explores many aspects of fire severity and fire resistance as applied to modern building design, pointing out that there is much more to fire safety than providing buildings with code-specified fire resistance, and that rational consideration of all factors is necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper exposes a number of fallacies about fire resistance in buildings. Much of the conventional wisdom is incorrect. By examining these fallacies, the paper asserts that there is a legitimate role for fire resisting elements in any building fire safety strategy, despite increasing reliance being placed on sprinklers and other active fire protection systems. The paper explores many aspects of fire severity and fire resistance as applied to modern building design, pointing out that there is much more to fire safety than providing buildings with code-specified fire resistance, and that rational consideration of all factors is necessary.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper exposes a number of fallacies about fire resistance in buildings. Much of the conventional wisdom is incorrect. By examining these fallacies, the paper asserts that there is a legitimate role for fire resisting elements in any building fire safety strategy, despite increasing reliance being placed on sprinklers and other active fire protection systems. The paper explores many aspects of fire severity and fire resistance as applied to modern building design, pointing out that there is much more to fire safety than providing buildings with code-specified fire resistance, and that rational consideration of all factors is necessary.

Key concepts: Fire resistance, Active fire protection, Architectural engineering, Fire safety, Resistance (ecology), Fire protection, Engineering, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fallacies And Facts In Design For Fire Resistance — Research Paper | ScholarLens