1985•Indian journal of plant protectionOpen access

Persistence Pattern and Waiting Periods for Some Insecticides on Pea Crop

A. K. Dikshit

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The persistence pattern and waiting period for sprays of phosalone (0.05%), fenitrothion (0.05 and 0.1%). oxydemeton-methyl (0.03 an4 0.95%), endosulfan (0.05 and 0.1%) and carbaryl (0.125 and 0.25%) in/on pea was studied under field conditions. Dissipation of the insecticides fo(lowed the first order reaction (the rate of degradation or dissipation was proportional to the logari-thmic Concentration of insecticides). The persistence pattern was. in the order: endosulfan> carbaryl - fenitrothion > phosalone = oxydemeton-methyl. The minimum waiting periods for acceptable levels of tesidues 9n pods were estimated as 15, 25, 20, 10 and 15 days for phosalone, fenitrothion, oxydemeton-methyl, endosulfan and carbaryl respectively. In case of leaf, a waiting period of 15 days is suggested for both endosulfan and carbaryl treatments. At harvest, seed and straw samples did not contain detectable levels of the insecticides.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The persistence pattern and waiting period for sprays of phosalone (0.05%), fenitrothion (0.05 and 0.1%). oxydemeton-methyl (0.03 an4 0.95%), endosulfan (0.05 and 0.1%) and carbaryl (0.125 and 0.25%) in/on pea was studied under field conditions. Dissipation of the insecticides fo(lowed the first order reaction (the rate of degradation or dissipation was proportional to the logari-thmic Concentration of insecticides). The persistence pattern was. in the order: endosulfan> carbaryl - fenitrothion > phosalone = oxydemeton-methyl. The minimum waiting periods for acceptable levels of tesidues 9n pods were estimated as 15, 25, 20, 10 and 15 days for phosalone, fenitrothion, oxydemeton-methyl, endosulfan and carbaryl respectively. In case of leaf, a waiting period of 15 days is suggested for both endosulfan and carbaryl treatments. At harvest, seed and straw samples did not contain detectable levels of the insecticides.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The persistence pattern and waiting period for sprays of phosalone (0.05%), fenitrothion (0.05 and 0.1%). oxydemeton-methyl (0.03 an4 0.95%), endosulfan (0.05 and 0.1%) and carbaryl (0.125 and 0.25%) in/on pea was studied under field conditions. Dissipation of the insecticides fo(lowed the first order reaction (the rate of degradation or dissipation was proportional to the logari-thmic Concentration of insecticides). The persistence pattern was. in the order: endosulfan> carbaryl - fenitrothion > phosalone = oxydemeton-methyl. The minimum waiting periods for acceptable levels of tesidues 9n pods were estimated as 15, 25, 20, 10 and 15 days for phosalone, fenitrothion, oxydemeton-methyl, endosulfan and carbaryl respectively. In case of leaf, a waiting period of 15 days is suggested for both endosulfan and carbaryl treatments. At harvest, seed and straw samples did not contain detectable levels of the insecticides.

Key concepts: Phosalone, Fenitrothion, Endosulfan, Carbaryl, Toxicology, Methidathion, Persistence (discontinuity), Waiting period

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Persistence Pattern and Waiting Periods for Some Insecticides on Pea Crop — Research Paper | ScholarLens