1997•Journal of Entomological ResearchRequires access

Effect of types of pheromone traps on moth catches of Heliothis armigera Hiibner on cotton

M. Loganathan, S. Uthamasamy

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Four types of pheromone traps, viz, sleeve trap, ICRISAT model funnel trap, Green Tech Agro Products funnel trap (GTAP), and yellow funnel trap with white cylindrical plastic container (YFT) were evaluated at different locations during 1995–96 on LRA 5166 cotton (summer crop), TCHB 213 interspecific hybrid (winter crop), and MCU 5 (hirsutum variety) cotton for their efficacy in attracting moths of Heliothis armigera Hub. The traps with one mg of septum were installed 50 days after sowing. Yellow funnel trap with white plastic container and GTAP attracted 38.56 and T 14.22 moths/trap/13 weeks, respectively under field conditions. This was followed by ICRISAT funnel trap and sleeve trap showing significantly low moth catches. In the laboratory, YFT and GTAP traps attracted 11.67 and 6.90 moths, respectively. Placing the trap at 90 cm from ground level (at crop canopy level) was effective with 6.56 moths/trap/7 weeks as compared to traps at 30 and 60 cm with 3.66 and 2.56 moths, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four types of pheromone traps, viz, sleeve trap, ICRISAT model funnel trap, Green Tech Agro Products funnel trap (GTAP), and yellow funnel trap with white cylindrical plastic container (YFT) were evaluated at different locations during 1995–96 on LRA 5166 cotton (summer crop), TCHB 213 interspecific hybrid (winter crop), and MCU 5 (hirsutum variety) cotton for their efficacy in attracting moths of Heliothis armigera Hub. The traps with one mg of septum were installed 50 days after sowing. Yellow funnel trap with white plastic container and GTAP attracted 38.56 and T 14.22 moths/trap/13 weeks, respectively under field conditions. This was followed by ICRISAT funnel trap and sleeve trap showing significantly low moth catches. In the laboratory, YFT and GTAP traps attracted 11.67 and 6.90 moths, respectively. Placing the trap at 90 cm from ground level (at crop canopy level) was effective with 6.56 moths/trap/7 weeks as compared to traps at 30 and 60 cm with 3.66 and 2.56 moths, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four types of pheromone traps, viz, sleeve trap, ICRISAT model funnel trap, Green Tech Agro Products funnel trap (GTAP), and yellow funnel trap with white cylindrical plastic container (YFT) were evaluated at different locations during 1995–96 on LRA 5166 cotton (summer crop), TCHB 213 interspecific hybrid (winter crop), and MCU 5 (hirsutum variety) cotton for their efficacy in attracting moths of Heliothis armigera Hub. The traps with one mg of septum were installed 50 days after sowing. Yellow funnel trap with white plastic container and GTAP attracted 38.56 and T 14.22 moths/trap/13 weeks, respectively under field conditions. This was followed by ICRISAT funnel trap and sleeve trap showing significantly low moth catches. In the laboratory, YFT and GTAP traps attracted 11.67 and 6.90 moths, respectively. Placing the trap at 90 cm from ground level (at crop canopy level) was effective with 6.56 moths/trap/7 weeks as compared to traps at 30 and 60 cm with 3.66 and 2.56 moths, respectively.

Key concepts: Trap (plumbing), Sowing, Horticulture, Crop, Biology, Trap crop, Toxicology, Sex pheromone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of types of pheromone traps on moth catches of Heliothis armigera Hiibner on cotton — Research Paper | ScholarLens