2006SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Fair Use? Fair Dealing?

Melissa de Zwart

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In May 2005, the Commonwealth Government invited responses to the Issues Paper: Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: An Examination of Fair Use, Fair Dealing and Other Exceptions in the Digital Age. Although presented as an open-ended review of existing exceptions, the Issues Paper appears to be operating on a foregone conclusion. That is, that a defense to copyright infringement modeled on a US open-ended fair use style defense (along with some other options) would serve as a panacea to the potential problems created by the strengthening of copyright owners' rights pursuant to amendments necessitated to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) as a consequence of Australia's entry into the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA). Further, the paper suggests that such amendments may assist in maintaining 'an appropriate balance between the rights of copyright owners and reasonable access to copyright material for users'. This conclusion is not supported by a more detailed analysis of the fair use defense as reflected in US case law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In May 2005, the Commonwealth Government invited responses to the Issues Paper: Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: An Examination of Fair Use, Fair Dealing and Other Exceptions in the Digital Age. Although presented as an open-ended review of existing exceptions, the Issues Paper appears to be operating on a foregone conclusion. That is, that a defense to copyright infringement modeled on a US open-ended fair use style defense (along with some other options) would serve as a panacea to the potential problems created by the strengthening of copyright owners' rights pursuant to amendments necessitated to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) as a consequence of Australia's entry into the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA). Further, the paper suggests that such amendments may assist in maintaining 'an appropriate balance between the rights of copyright owners and reasonable access to copyright material for users'. This conclusion is not supported by a more detailed analysis of the fair use defense as reflected in US case law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In May 2005, the Commonwealth Government invited responses to the Issues Paper: Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: An Examination of Fair Use, Fair Dealing and Other Exceptions in the Digital Age. Although presented as an open-ended review of existing exceptions, the Issues Paper appears to be operating on a foregone conclusion. That is, that a defense to copyright infringement modeled on a US open-ended fair use style defense (along with some other options) would serve as a panacea to the potential problems created by the strengthening of copyright owners' rights pursuant to amendments necessitated to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) as a consequence of Australia's entry into the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA). Further, the paper suggests that such amendments may assist in maintaining 'an appropriate balance between the rights of copyright owners and reasonable access to copyright material for users'. This conclusion is not supported by a more detailed analysis of the fair use defense as reflected in US case law.

Key concepts: Fair use, Panacea (medicine), Fair dealing, Balance (ability), Copyright Act, Law and economics, Copyright infringement, Commonwealth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fair Use? Fair Dealing? — Research Paper | ScholarLens