2008Zhōnghuá gǔkē yīxué zázhìRequires access

Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Isolated Femoral Shaft Fractures-Experience in a Regional Hospital

Chun-Yang Chen, Lih‐Yuann Shih, Chao‐Yu Chen, Mel S. Lee, Wen‐Ling Yeh, Chung-I Shen, Chin-Chou Hsu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Closed intramedullary nail placement is the current standard of treatment for femoral shaft fractures. Nevertheless, open surgery for nail placement is sometimes advocated by orthopedists because of the lack of availability of a fluoroscopic image intensifier and/or concern about the potential disadvantages of closed reduction techniques. There are only a few reports in which closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures are compared and their conclusions are discordant. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the results of closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in a regional hospital. Methods: Between July 2003 and June 2005, a total of 32 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated in our hospital. Fifteen patients underwent closed intramedullary nail placement and 17 underwent open nailing. The clinical data and results were compared retrospectively. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient demographics, fracture patterns, preoperative hemoglobin level, and operation time. Duration of hospital stay and time to bone union were shorter in the closed nailing group. The estimated amount of intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, and the number of patients requiring blood transfusions were significantly greater in the open nailing group. Intraoperative splitting fractures of the femur occurred in two closed nailing patients. Postoperative morbidities (infection, refracture, and nail failure) requiring a second operation occurred in three open nailing patients. Conclusions: Open nailing increases blood loss and transfusion requirements without shortening the operation time. A static interlocking nail inserted using the closed technique remains the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fracture and it produces a relatively shorter hospital stay and time to bone union.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: Closed intramedullary nail placement is the current standard of treatment for femoral shaft fractures. Nevertheless, open surgery for nail placement is sometimes advocated by orthopedists because of the lack of availability of a fluoroscopic image intensifier and/or concern about the potential disadvantages of closed reduction techniques. There are only a few reports in which closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures are compared and their conclusions are discordant. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the results of closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in a regional hospital. Methods: Between July 2003 and June 2005, a total of 32 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated in our hospital. Fifteen patients underwent closed intramedullary nail placement and 17 underwent open nailing. The clinical data and results were compared retrospectively. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient demographics, fracture patterns, preoperative hemoglobin level, and operation time. Duration of hospital stay and time to bone union were shorter in the closed nailing group. The estimated amount of intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, and the number of patients requiring blood transfusions were significantly greater in the open nailing group. Intraoperative splitting fractures of the femur occurred in two closed nailing patients. Postoperative morbidities (infection, refracture, and nail failure) requiring a second operation occurred in three open nailing patients. Conclusions: Open nailing increases blood loss and transfusion requirements without shortening the operation time. A static interlocking nail inserted using the closed technique remains the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fracture and it produces a relatively shorter hospital stay and time to bone union.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: Closed intramedullary nail placement is the current standard of treatment for femoral shaft fractures. Nevertheless, open surgery for nail placement is sometimes advocated by orthopedists because of the lack of availability of a fluoroscopic image intensifier and/or concern about the potential disadvantages of closed reduction techniques. There are only a few reports in which closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures are compared and their conclusions are discordant. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the results of closed and open nailing techniques for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in a regional hospital. Methods: Between July 2003 and June 2005, a total of 32 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated in our hospital. Fifteen patients underwent closed intramedullary nail placement and 17 underwent open nailing. The clinical data and results were compared retrospectively. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient demographics, fracture patterns, preoperative hemoglobin level, and operation time. Duration of hospital stay and time to bone union were shorter in the closed nailing group. The estimated amount of intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, and the number of patients requiring blood transfusions were significantly greater in the open nailing group. Intraoperative splitting fractures of the femur occurred in two closed nailing patients. Postoperative morbidities (infection, refracture, and nail failure) requiring a second operation occurred in three open nailing patients. Conclusions: Open nailing increases blood loss and transfusion requirements without shortening the operation time. A static interlocking nail inserted using the closed technique remains the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fracture and it produces a relatively shorter hospital stay and time to bone union.

Key concepts: Intramedullary rod, Medicine, Surgery, Femoral shaft, Nail (fastener), Blood loss, Femur, Blood transfusion

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Isolated Femoral Shaft Fractures-Experience in a Regional Hospital — Research Paper | ScholarLens