2000•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Performance Measurement In A Cost Center Considering Production Lead Time

Phillip J. Lederer, Seung‐Kyu Rhee

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper studies the design of the performance evaluation system in a decentralized firm where units are organized as cost centers and lead time has an important effect on demand or cost. The paper has two conclusions. First, performance measurement systems exist and lead the firm to a profit maximum if correct weight is assigned to a cost centers' lead time performance. However, computation of the proper weight requires that general managers have specific knowledge of the cost centers' tradeoff between cost and lead time. Second, an iterative procedure leads to a profit optimum if accurate estimates of marginal cost, which include opportunity costs, are available. Two potential difficulties cause suboptimal profits under decentralization: the cost center's performance measurement system is not optimal, and inaccurate estimates of marginal cost are used by general managers when setting production levels. The first problem is solved if general management knows customers' value of lead time and the tradeoff of cost and lead time. Different types of investments can be used to gain this knowledge, such as engineering studies about the technical relationship between cost and lead time, marketing research studies, cycle time reduction programs, just-in- time programs, quality improvement programs and customer satisfaction surveys. The second problem can be solved by using lead time measures to estimate marginal cost.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper studies the design of the performance evaluation system in a decentralized firm where units are organized as cost centers and lead time has an important effect on demand or cost. The paper has two conclusions. First, performance measurement systems exist and lead the firm to a profit maximum if correct weight is assigned to a cost centers' lead time performance. However, computation of the proper weight requires that general managers have specific knowledge of the cost centers' tradeoff between cost and lead time. Second, an iterative procedure leads to a profit optimum if accurate estimates of marginal cost, which include opportunity costs, are available. Two potential difficulties cause suboptimal profits under decentralization: the cost center's performance measurement system is not optimal, and inaccurate estimates of marginal cost are used by general managers when setting production levels. The first problem is solved if general management knows customers' value of lead time and the tradeoff of cost and lead time. Different types of investments can be used to gain this knowledge, such as engineering studies about the technical relationship between cost and lead time, marketing research studies, cycle time reduction programs, just-in- time programs, quality improvement programs and customer satisfaction surveys. The second problem can be solved by using lead time measures to estimate marginal cost.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper studies the design of the performance evaluation system in a decentralized firm where units are organized as cost centers and lead time has an important effect on demand or cost. The paper has two conclusions. First, performance measurement systems exist and lead the firm to a profit maximum if correct weight is assigned to a cost centers' lead time performance. However, computation of the proper weight requires that general managers have specific knowledge of the cost centers' tradeoff between cost and lead time. Second, an iterative procedure leads to a profit optimum if accurate estimates of marginal cost, which include opportunity costs, are available. Two potential difficulties cause suboptimal profits under decentralization: the cost center's performance measurement system is not optimal, and inaccurate estimates of marginal cost are used by general managers when setting production levels. The first problem is solved if general management knows customers' value of lead time and the tradeoff of cost and lead time. Different types of investments can be used to gain this knowledge, such as engineering studies about the technical relationship between cost and lead time, marketing research studies, cycle time reduction programs, just-in- time programs, quality improvement programs and customer satisfaction surveys. The second problem can be solved by using lead time measures to estimate marginal cost.

Key concepts: Lead time, Marginal cost, Profit (economics), Total absorption costing, Cost centre, Production (economics), Implicit cost, Lead (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Measurement In A Cost Center Considering Production Lead Time — Research Paper | ScholarLens