2013SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Executive Branch and International Law

Mark Weisburd

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

This article challenges the view that the constitutional obligation of the President of the United States to “take care that the laws [are] faithfully executed” does not oblige him to conform American foreign policy to customary international law. In particular, it argues that rules of customary international law were not among the “laws” to which the constitutional language refers, that the federal courts’ authority to create federal common law does not extend to the types of questions addressed by customary international law, and that in any event decisions by the judiciary requiring the President to conform to customary international law would raise serious separation of powers problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article challenges the view that the constitutional obligation of the President of the United States to “take care that the laws [are] faithfully executed” does not oblige him to conform American foreign policy to customary international law. In particular, it argues that rules of customary international law were not among the “laws” to which the constitutional language refers, that the federal courts’ authority to create federal common law does not extend to the types of questions addressed by customary international law, and that in any event decisions by the judiciary requiring the President to conform to customary international law would raise serious separation of powers problems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article challenges the view that the constitutional obligation of the President of the United States to “take care that the laws [are] faithfully executed” does not oblige him to conform American foreign policy to customary international law. In particular, it argues that rules of customary international law were not among the “laws” to which the constitutional language refers, that the federal courts’ authority to create federal common law does not extend to the types of questions addressed by customary international law, and that in any event decisions by the judiciary requiring the President to conform to customary international law would raise serious separation of powers problems.

Key concepts: Law, Obligation, Customary international law, Political science, International law, Municipal law, Separation of powers, Common law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Executive Branch and International Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens