2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Effect of Herbal and Chemical Mouth-rinses on Periodontal Indices; Comparison of Matrica, Persica and Chlorhexidine

Mohammad Taghi Chitsazi, Adileh Shirmohammadi, E. Balayi

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Due to the limitations of mechanical plaque control methods, the use of chemical methods have been recommended, and Chlorhexidine has been shown to be the gold standard mouth-rinse. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two herbal mouth-rinses with each other, and with Chlorhexidine on some periodontal indices. Materials and method : In this double-blinded interventional study, 30 male dental students were divided into three equal groups. Before and after using of the two herbal and one chemical mouth-rinses (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) periodontal indices including plaque, gingival, and tooth staining were measured and recorded. All samples consumed the three mouth-rinses in two week intervals. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test for evaluation of dependent variables in each group, and ANOVA for dependent variables between the three mouth-rinses. Results : The three mouth-rinses used in this study (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) caused reduction in plaque index by 30.589.22%, 19.448.43% and 19.628.7%, respectively. All the mouth-rinses decreased the plaque index but the reduction was more prominent with Chlorhexidine (p<0.05). Also, Chlorhexidine caused more gingival index reduction in comparison with Matrica and Persica (p<0.05). Herbal mouth-rinses caused small areas of staining but Chlorhexidine increased stain index value by its extension and intensity. The difference between the two herbal mouth-rinses was not statistically significant, while the difference was significant in comparison with the chemical mouth-rinse (p<0.05). Conclusion : As the extension and intensity of staining caused by Chlorhexidin as a chemical agent was significantly more than the herbal mouth-rinses, also its effect on plaque and gingival indices was more. So, the benefits and side effects of each mouth-rinse should be considered in their clinical application. Key words : Herbal mouth-rinse, Chemical mouth-rinse, Periodontal indices

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Statement of Problem: Due to the limitations of mechanical plaque control methods, the use of chemical methods have been recommended, and Chlorhexidine has been shown to be the gold standard mouth-rinse. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two herbal mouth-rinses with each other, and with Chlorhexidine on some periodontal indices. Materials and method : In this double-blinded interventional study, 30 male dental students were divided into three equal groups. Before and after using of the two herbal and one chemical mouth-rinses (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) periodontal indices including plaque, gingival, and tooth staining were measured and recorded. All samples consumed the three mouth-rinses in two week intervals. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test for evaluation of dependent variables in each group, and ANOVA for dependent variables between the three mouth-rinses. Results : The three mouth-rinses used in this study (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) caused reduction in plaque index by 30.589.22%, 19.448.43% and 19.628.7%, respectively. All the mouth-rinses decreased the plaque index but the reduction was more prominent with Chlorhexidine (p<0.05). Also, Chlorhexidine caused more gingival index reduction in comparison with Matrica and Persica (p<0.05). Herbal mouth-rinses caused small areas of staining but Chlorhexidine increased stain index value by its extension and intensity. The difference between the two herbal mouth-rinses was not statistically significant, while the difference was significant in comparison with the chemical mouth-rinse (p<0.05). Conclusion : As the extension and intensity of staining caused by Chlorhexidin as a chemical agent was significantly more than the herbal mouth-rinses, also its effect on plaque and gingival indices was more. So, the benefits and side effects of each mouth-rinse should be considered in their clinical application. Key words : Herbal mouth-rinse, Chemical mouth-rinse, Periodontal indices

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Statement of Problem: Due to the limitations of mechanical plaque control methods, the use of chemical methods have been recommended, and Chlorhexidine has been shown to be the gold standard mouth-rinse. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two herbal mouth-rinses with each other, and with Chlorhexidine on some periodontal indices. Materials and method : In this double-blinded interventional study, 30 male dental students were divided into three equal groups. Before and after using of the two herbal and one chemical mouth-rinses (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) periodontal indices including plaque, gingival, and tooth staining were measured and recorded. All samples consumed the three mouth-rinses in two week intervals. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test for evaluation of dependent variables in each group, and ANOVA for dependent variables between the three mouth-rinses. Results : The three mouth-rinses used in this study (Matrica, Persica, and Chlorhexidine) caused reduction in plaque index by 30.589.22%, 19.448.43% and 19.628.7%, respectively. All the mouth-rinses decreased the plaque index but the reduction was more prominent with Chlorhexidine (p<0.05). Also, Chlorhexidine caused more gingival index reduction in comparison with Matrica and Persica (p<0.05). Herbal mouth-rinses caused small areas of staining but Chlorhexidine increased stain index value by its extension and intensity. The difference between the two herbal mouth-rinses was not statistically significant, while the difference was significant in comparison with the chemical mouth-rinse (p<0.05). Conclusion : As the extension and intensity of staining caused by Chlorhexidin as a chemical agent was significantly more than the herbal mouth-rinses, also its effect on plaque and gingival indices was more. So, the benefits and side effects of each mouth-rinse should be considered in their clinical application. Key words : Herbal mouth-rinse, Chemical mouth-rinse, Periodontal indices

Key concepts: Chlorhexidine, Mouth rinse, Dentistry, Medicine, Dental plaque

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Herbal and Chemical Mouth-rinses on Periodontal Indices; Comparison of Matrica, Persica and Chlorhexidine — Research Paper | ScholarLens