1988•Chemical & Engineering NewsRequires access

Waste Treatment Regulation To Exact Heavy Penalty on Industry

DAVID HANSON

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When Congress passed the 1984 amendments to the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), one thing it wanted to do was prevent future landfill problems. It did this by specifying that many industrial wastes would have to be treated to make them safe before they were discarded. The Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of issuing regulations to ensure industry compliance with that directive. Last week, EPA proposed what will be the most expensive hazardous waste treatment regulation under the RCRA amendments. This rule will affect 24 types of industrial waste streams, to be increased to 41 waste streams by an additional proposal in about one month. The rule requires that all the wastes be treated and stipulates exactly what the treatments will be. Companies have no choice in the matter. EPA estimates that the annual cost to comply with this rule will be between $650 million and $700 million. Sylvia K. Lowrance, director ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When Congress passed the 1984 amendments to the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), one thing it wanted to do was prevent future landfill problems. It did this by specifying that many industrial wastes would have to be treated to make them safe before they were discarded. The Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of issuing regulations to ensure industry compliance with that directive. Last week, EPA proposed what will be the most expensive hazardous waste treatment regulation under the RCRA amendments. This rule will affect 24 types of industrial waste streams, to be increased to 41 waste streams by an additional proposal in about one month. The rule requires that all the wastes be treated and stipulates exactly what the treatments will be. Companies have no choice in the matter. EPA estimates that the annual cost to comply with this rule will be between $650 million and $700 million. Sylvia K. Lowrance, director ...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When Congress passed the 1984 amendments to the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), one thing it wanted to do was prevent future landfill problems. It did this by specifying that many industrial wastes would have to be treated to make them safe before they were discarded. The Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of issuing regulations to ensure industry compliance with that directive. Last week, EPA proposed what will be the most expensive hazardous waste treatment regulation under the RCRA amendments. This rule will affect 24 types of industrial waste streams, to be increased to 41 waste streams by an additional proposal in about one month. The rule requires that all the wastes be treated and stipulates exactly what the treatments will be. Companies have no choice in the matter. EPA estimates that the annual cost to comply with this rule will be between $650 million and $700 million. Sylvia K. Lowrance, director ...

Key concepts: Citation, Social media, Computer science, Set (abstract data type), Information retrieval, Operations research, Library science, World Wide Web

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Waste Treatment Regulation To Exact Heavy Penalty on Industry — Research Paper | ScholarLens