Intertester Reliability for Measuring Pelvic Tilt in Standing
Debra J. Alviso, Gordon T. Dong, Gary Lentell
Abstract
Debra J. Alviso, Gordon T. Dong, Gary Lentell
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine intertester reliability using a method of measuring the relaxed standing pelvic-tilt angle, active anterior and posterior pelvic-tilt angles and ranges of motion, and the total pelvic-tilt ROM in the sagittal plane. After an instructional session, 6 testers measured the pelvic-tilt angles of the right side of 12 subjects. Pelvic-tilt angles were calculated using trigonometric functions. Degrees of ROM were determined from the pelvic-tilt angles obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .95 for standing pelvic-tilt angle, .93 for the anterior pelvic-tilt angle, .93 for the posterior pelvic-tilt angle, .88 for the anterior pelvic-tilt ROM, .93 for the posterior pelvic-tilt ROM, and .90 for the total pelvic-tilt ROM. We concluded that intertester reliability, using this method, was very high for measuring pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane.
OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this study was to examine intertester reliability using a method of measuring the relaxed standing pelvic-tilt angle, active anterior and posterior pelvic-tilt angles and ranges of motion, and the total pelvic-tilt ROM in the sagittal plane. After an instructional session, 6 testers measured the pelvic-tilt angles of the right side of 12 subjects. Pelvic-tilt angles were calculated using trigonometric functions. Degrees of ROM were determined from the pelvic-tilt angles obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .95 for standing pelvic-tilt angle, .93 for the anterior pelvic-tilt angle, .93 for the posterior pelvic-tilt angle, .88 for the anterior pelvic-tilt ROM, .93 for the posterior pelvic-tilt ROM, and .90 for the total pelvic-tilt ROM. We concluded that intertester reliability, using this method, was very high for measuring pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane.
Key concepts: Pelvic tilt, Tilt (camera), Sagittal plane, Intraclass correlation, Medicine, Orthodontics, Physics, Anatomy