1992PubMedRequires access

A comparative study with intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 versus papaverine for the diagnostic assessment of erectile impotence.

Chii‐Jye Wang, Chung‐Chieng Wu, Chun‐Hsiung Huang, Chin-Pei Chiang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs is a valuable diagnostic aid and an important tool for the treatment of erectile failure. A comparative study with intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and papaverine was performed in 60 patients with impotence. We evaluated the efficiency and side effects of both agents. The overall positive response rate was 85.0% in the PGE1 group and 65.0% in the papaverine group which suggests PGE1 has a stronger vascular effect. The mean onset of maximal erection was after 9.6 minutes in the PGE1 group and after 6.5 minutes in the papaverine group. The mean maintenance of erection was for 53.2 minutes in the PGE1 group and for 38.6 minutes in the papaverine group. There were no systemic side effects of either agent. Three instances of injection pain and 2 of burning sensation in the penis were noted in the PGE1 group, while in the papaverine group, there were 21 reports of injection pain, 4 of prolonged erection and 2 of burning sensation in the penis. These results suggest that PGE1 is a more desirable vasoactive alternative for the diagnosis of impotence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs is a valuable diagnostic aid and an important tool for the treatment of erectile failure. A comparative study with intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and papaverine was performed in 60 patients with impotence. We evaluated the efficiency and side effects of both agents. The overall positive response rate was 85.0% in the PGE1 group and 65.0% in the papaverine group which suggests PGE1 has a stronger vascular effect. The mean onset of maximal erection was after 9.6 minutes in the PGE1 group and after 6.5 minutes in the papaverine group. The mean maintenance of erection was for 53.2 minutes in the PGE1 group and for 38.6 minutes in the papaverine group. There were no systemic side effects of either agent. Three instances of injection pain and 2 of burning sensation in the penis were noted in the PGE1 group, while in the papaverine group, there were 21 reports of injection pain, 4 of prolonged erection and 2 of burning sensation in the penis. These results suggest that PGE1 is a more desirable vasoactive alternative for the diagnosis of impotence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs is a valuable diagnostic aid and an important tool for the treatment of erectile failure. A comparative study with intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and papaverine was performed in 60 patients with impotence. We evaluated the efficiency and side effects of both agents. The overall positive response rate was 85.0% in the PGE1 group and 65.0% in the papaverine group which suggests PGE1 has a stronger vascular effect. The mean onset of maximal erection was after 9.6 minutes in the PGE1 group and after 6.5 minutes in the papaverine group. The mean maintenance of erection was for 53.2 minutes in the PGE1 group and for 38.6 minutes in the papaverine group. There were no systemic side effects of either agent. Three instances of injection pain and 2 of burning sensation in the penis were noted in the PGE1 group, while in the papaverine group, there were 21 reports of injection pain, 4 of prolonged erection and 2 of burning sensation in the penis. These results suggest that PGE1 is a more desirable vasoactive alternative for the diagnosis of impotence.

Key concepts: Papaverine, Medicine, Prostaglandin E1, Intracavernous injection, Penis, Vasoactive, Erectile dysfunction, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study with intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 versus papaverine for the diagnostic assessment of erectile impotence. — Research Paper | ScholarLens