2009•영어학Requires access

Conversion as Zero Affixation : Evidence from Affix Interaction

Yong‐Sung Lee

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There are several conflicting views on the theoretical status of conversion in current morphological research. This paper reviews these different views and shows that conversion is better understood when it is viewed as affixation that involves zero morphemes. The arguments come from the overall simplicity of morphological operation, the overt similarity of conversion to derivation and the problem of approximate conversion. This paper will also examine the problems of conversion as zero affixation. It will be shown that the zero morphemes are problematic only in the framework of Lexical Morphology. With the incorporation of recent research, we can clearly see the interaction of overt and zero morphemes. This evidences that conversion is a kind of derivation by adding zero-morphemes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are several conflicting views on the theoretical status of conversion in current morphological research. This paper reviews these different views and shows that conversion is better understood when it is viewed as affixation that involves zero morphemes. The arguments come from the overall simplicity of morphological operation, the overt similarity of conversion to derivation and the problem of approximate conversion. This paper will also examine the problems of conversion as zero affixation. It will be shown that the zero morphemes are problematic only in the framework of Lexical Morphology. With the incorporation of recent research, we can clearly see the interaction of overt and zero morphemes. This evidences that conversion is a kind of derivation by adding zero-morphemes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are several conflicting views on the theoretical status of conversion in current morphological research. This paper reviews these different views and shows that conversion is better understood when it is viewed as affixation that involves zero morphemes. The arguments come from the overall simplicity of morphological operation, the overt similarity of conversion to derivation and the problem of approximate conversion. This paper will also examine the problems of conversion as zero affixation. It will be shown that the zero morphemes are problematic only in the framework of Lexical Morphology. With the incorporation of recent research, we can clearly see the interaction of overt and zero morphemes. This evidences that conversion is a kind of derivation by adding zero-morphemes.

Key concepts: Morpheme, Affix, Zero (linguistics), Morphophonology, Linguistics, Mathematics, Simplicity, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conversion as Zero Affixation : Evidence from Affix Interaction — Research Paper | ScholarLens