1999PubMedRequires access

Acute jaundice in pregnancy: acute fatty liver or acute viral hepatitis?

Wei‐Wu Pang, Chih-Hung Lei, Da-Peng Chang, Teng-Fan Yang, Yung-Tai Chung, Mm-Ho Huang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this case, the difficulty in differential diagnosis between acute viral hepatitis and acute fatty liver of pregnancy was analyzed. These 2 conditions often raise controversal question regarding the decision making on emergency anesthesia for cesarean section to avert complications and optimize management. The dilemma in which an anesthesiologist is put is whether to promise the anesthesia straightaway in the face of a demonstrable acute jaundice in pregnancy to advise a postponement of surgery until a turn for the better. In this embarrassing situation, the authors suggest that a postpronement of surgery is rational to observe the development during which both the mother and the fetus should be closely monitored. Once the necessity of a cesarean section outweighs the benefit of transitional conservative treatment, it should be performed immediately.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this case, the difficulty in differential diagnosis between acute viral hepatitis and acute fatty liver of pregnancy was analyzed. These 2 conditions often raise controversal question regarding the decision making on emergency anesthesia for cesarean section to avert complications and optimize management. The dilemma in which an anesthesiologist is put is whether to promise the anesthesia straightaway in the face of a demonstrable acute jaundice in pregnancy to advise a postponement of surgery until a turn for the better. In this embarrassing situation, the authors suggest that a postpronement of surgery is rational to observe the development during which both the mother and the fetus should be closely monitored. Once the necessity of a cesarean section outweighs the benefit of transitional conservative treatment, it should be performed immediately.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this case, the difficulty in differential diagnosis between acute viral hepatitis and acute fatty liver of pregnancy was analyzed. These 2 conditions often raise controversal question regarding the decision making on emergency anesthesia for cesarean section to avert complications and optimize management. The dilemma in which an anesthesiologist is put is whether to promise the anesthesia straightaway in the face of a demonstrable acute jaundice in pregnancy to advise a postponement of surgery until a turn for the better. In this embarrassing situation, the authors suggest that a postpronement of surgery is rational to observe the development during which both the mother and the fetus should be closely monitored. Once the necessity of a cesarean section outweighs the benefit of transitional conservative treatment, it should be performed immediately.

Key concepts: Medicine, Acute fatty liver of pregnancy, Pregnancy, Jaundice, Viral hepatitis, Acute hepatitis, Intensive care medicine, Postponement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acute jaundice in pregnancy: acute fatty liver or acute viral hepatitis? — Research Paper | ScholarLens