1996The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Open access

"Punishment" and the Eighth Amendment

Thomas K. Landry

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Eighth Amendment doctrine may be headed for a showdown.The Supreme Court has unduly softened the Amendment's central limitation: its applicability to nothing but "punishments." 1 This prerequisite is finessed m cases involving conditions of confinement and is ignored in cases involving use of force.As a result, Eighth Amendment doctrine lacks a backbone of principle.This Article offers a few doctrinal repairs that would restore punishment as a threshold element m Eighth Amendment cases, and thus put sense back m the interpretation and application of a great constitutional protection.The Eighth Amendment-like so many other constitutional provisions 2underwent dramatic liberalization during the twentieth century 3 That is good to the extent that constitutional liberties have been made real in the lives of ordinary citizens who formerly could look to the Constitution as a source only of aspiration and not of protection.4 But liberalization has its limits, and

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eighth Amendment doctrine may be headed for a showdown.The Supreme Court has unduly softened the Amendment's central limitation: its applicability to nothing but "punishments." 1 This prerequisite is finessed m cases involving conditions of confinement and is ignored in cases involving use of force.As a result, Eighth Amendment doctrine lacks a backbone of principle.This Article offers a few doctrinal repairs that would restore punishment as a threshold element m Eighth Amendment cases, and thus put sense back m the interpretation and application of a great constitutional protection.The Eighth Amendment-like so many other constitutional provisions 2underwent dramatic liberalization during the twentieth century 3 That is good to the extent that constitutional liberties have been made real in the lives of ordinary citizens who formerly could look to the Constitution as a source only of aspiration and not of protection.4 But liberalization has its limits, and

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eighth Amendment doctrine may be headed for a showdown.The Supreme Court has unduly softened the Amendment's central limitation: its applicability to nothing but "punishments." 1 This prerequisite is finessed m cases involving conditions of confinement and is ignored in cases involving use of force.As a result, Eighth Amendment doctrine lacks a backbone of principle.This Article offers a few doctrinal repairs that would restore punishment as a threshold element m Eighth Amendment cases, and thus put sense back m the interpretation and application of a great constitutional protection.The Eighth Amendment-like so many other constitutional provisions 2underwent dramatic liberalization during the twentieth century 3 That is good to the extent that constitutional liberties have been made real in the lives of ordinary citizens who formerly could look to the Constitution as a source only of aspiration and not of protection.4 But liberalization has its limits, and

Key concepts: Punishment (psychology), Criminology, Political science, Law, Psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Punishment" and the Eighth Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens