2012eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Requires access

Persistence of mature-forest biodiversity elements in a production-forest landscape managed under a Regional Forest Agreement

T Wardlow, Simon Grove, J Balmer, AB Hingston, Lynne Forster, C Schmucki, Stephen Read

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The study explored a key objective of the biodiversity conservation strategy delivered through Regional Forest Agreements (RFA), which we paraphrase as: forest-dependent species should be able to persist throughout their range, equally in landscapes dominated by production-forests as in landscapes dominated by reserves. We focused on the mature-forest element of biodiversity, because mature forest is more likely to be in short supply in production-forest landscapes than is younger forest. Our assumption is not that production forest must support mature-forest biodiversity in all places at all times, but that any local losses arising through forest harvesting should be temporary, with all areas of native forest at least retaining the potential to regain over time those lost mature-forest species. In this respect, species dynamics after forest harvesting and regeneration can resemble species dynamics after wildfire and forest regrowth. We developed two hypotheses to test the extent to which the RFA is achieving this persistence objective. They were: (i) the biodiversity in mature eucalypt forest would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape; (ii) that the recolonisation of silvicultural regeneration by mature-forest species would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape. We then used the findings from testing these hypotheses to suggest some simple metrics and other planning tools that could guide future management and planning in relation to the spatial and temporal arrangement of mature forest in production-forest landscapes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study explored a key objective of the biodiversity conservation strategy delivered through Regional Forest Agreements (RFA), which we paraphrase as: forest-dependent species should be able to persist throughout their range, equally in landscapes dominated by production-forests as in landscapes dominated by reserves. We focused on the mature-forest element of biodiversity, because mature forest is more likely to be in short supply in production-forest landscapes than is younger forest. Our assumption is not that production forest must support mature-forest biodiversity in all places at all times, but that any local losses arising through forest harvesting should be temporary, with all areas of native forest at least retaining the potential to regain over time those lost mature-forest species. In this respect, species dynamics after forest harvesting and regeneration can resemble species dynamics after wildfire and forest regrowth. We developed two hypotheses to test the extent to which the RFA is achieving this persistence objective. They were: (i) the biodiversity in mature eucalypt forest would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape; (ii) that the recolonisation of silvicultural regeneration by mature-forest species would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape. We then used the findings from testing these hypotheses to suggest some simple metrics and other planning tools that could guide future management and planning in relation to the spatial and temporal arrangement of mature forest in production-forest landscapes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study explored a key objective of the biodiversity conservation strategy delivered through Regional Forest Agreements (RFA), which we paraphrase as: forest-dependent species should be able to persist throughout their range, equally in landscapes dominated by production-forests as in landscapes dominated by reserves. We focused on the mature-forest element of biodiversity, because mature forest is more likely to be in short supply in production-forest landscapes than is younger forest. Our assumption is not that production forest must support mature-forest biodiversity in all places at all times, but that any local losses arising through forest harvesting should be temporary, with all areas of native forest at least retaining the potential to regain over time those lost mature-forest species. In this respect, species dynamics after forest harvesting and regeneration can resemble species dynamics after wildfire and forest regrowth. We developed two hypotheses to test the extent to which the RFA is achieving this persistence objective. They were: (i) the biodiversity in mature eucalypt forest would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape; (ii) that the recolonisation of silvicultural regeneration by mature-forest species would be independent of the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape. We then used the findings from testing these hypotheses to suggest some simple metrics and other planning tools that could guide future management and planning in relation to the spatial and temporal arrangement of mature forest in production-forest landscapes.

Key concepts: Biodiversity, Forest restoration, Forest management, Disturbance (geology), Intact forest landscape, Agroforestry, Secondary forest, Forest dynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Persistence of mature-forest biodiversity elements in a production-forest landscape managed under a Regional Forest Agreement — Research Paper | ScholarLens