2006Animal Nutrition and Feed TechnologyRequires access

Peformance of grazing or stall-fed lambs on supplementation with concentrate and roughage resources

A. Ravi, J. Rama Prasad

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In two separate growth (180d) trials, 30 each of grazing (experiment-1: semi-intensive system) or stall fed (experiment-2: intensive system) Nellore Brown lambs were supplemented with concentrates (maize and deoiled groundnut cake) alone (T-1), or along with groundnut haulms (T-2), dry leaf meal of Leucaena leucocephala (T-3), Sesbania grandiflora (T-4), Gliricidia maculata (T-5) or Ficus bangalensis (T-6) to study the effect of supplementation on digestibility of nutrients, growth performance and economics of feeding. The digestibility of nutrients in the diet was improved in lambs fed concentrate (T-1), Leucaena (T-3) or Sesbania (T-4) supplemented groups than in other treatments in experiment 1. The ADG (g), feed efficiency (P<0.01) and cost (Rs.) of feed/kg gain (P<0.05) were 59, 43, 44, 49, 41 and 40; 10.3, 13.8, 13.9, 11.9, 14.2 and 14.3 and 66.3, 74.5, 74.7, 64.1, 76.9 and 77.1 in lambs on treatments 1 to 6, respectively. In lambs stall-fed on fresh hybrid napier (NB-21) along with different supplements (experiment - 2), the digestibility of DM, CF, NDF, ADF, hemicellulose and cellulose was not significantly different among the treatments. The digestibility of CP in T-1 and T-4, EE in T-1 and T-5 was higher (P<0.01) than in other treatments while NFE and OM digestibility in T-1 was higher (P<0.01) than in T-6. The ADG (g) and feed efficiency were 43, 39, 46, 49,42 and 35 and 10.7, 11.8, 9.9, 9.5,10.6 and 11.9 in treatments 1 to 6, respectively. The cost of feed/kg gain (Rs.) was higher (P<0.01) in T-1 (68.5) than in T-3 (44.9) or T-4 (44.1) while in other treatments viz., T-2 (57.9), T-5 (49.5) and T-6 (59.7) it was comparable. The results suggested that economical and sustainable lamb production could be promoted by supplementation of Sesbania under semi-intensive system. Supplementation with Leucaena leucocephala, Sesbania or Gliricidia may be effective and economical under intensive system of rearing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In two separate growth (180d) trials, 30 each of grazing (experiment-1: semi-intensive system) or stall fed (experiment-2: intensive system) Nellore Brown lambs were supplemented with concentrates (maize and deoiled groundnut cake) alone (T-1), or along with groundnut haulms (T-2), dry leaf meal of Leucaena leucocephala (T-3), Sesbania grandiflora (T-4), Gliricidia maculata (T-5) or Ficus bangalensis (T-6) to study the effect of supplementation on digestibility of nutrients, growth performance and economics of feeding. The digestibility of nutrients in the diet was improved in lambs fed concentrate (T-1), Leucaena (T-3) or Sesbania (T-4) supplemented groups than in other treatments in experiment 1. The ADG (g), feed efficiency (P<0.01) and cost (Rs.) of feed/kg gain (P<0.05) were 59, 43, 44, 49, 41 and 40; 10.3, 13.8, 13.9, 11.9, 14.2 and 14.3 and 66.3, 74.5, 74.7, 64.1, 76.9 and 77.1 in lambs on treatments 1 to 6, respectively. In lambs stall-fed on fresh hybrid napier (NB-21) along with different supplements (experiment - 2), the digestibility of DM, CF, NDF, ADF, hemicellulose and cellulose was not significantly different among the treatments. The digestibility of CP in T-1 and T-4, EE in T-1 and T-5 was higher (P<0.01) than in other treatments while NFE and OM digestibility in T-1 was higher (P<0.01) than in T-6. The ADG (g) and feed efficiency were 43, 39, 46, 49,42 and 35 and 10.7, 11.8, 9.9, 9.5,10.6 and 11.9 in treatments 1 to 6, respectively. The cost of feed/kg gain (Rs.) was higher (P<0.01) in T-1 (68.5) than in T-3 (44.9) or T-4 (44.1) while in other treatments viz., T-2 (57.9), T-5 (49.5) and T-6 (59.7) it was comparable. The results suggested that economical and sustainable lamb production could be promoted by supplementation of Sesbania under semi-intensive system. Supplementation with Leucaena leucocephala, Sesbania or Gliricidia may be effective and economical under intensive system of rearing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In two separate growth (180d) trials, 30 each of grazing (experiment-1: semi-intensive system) or stall fed (experiment-2: intensive system) Nellore Brown lambs were supplemented with concentrates (maize and deoiled groundnut cake) alone (T-1), or along with groundnut haulms (T-2), dry leaf meal of Leucaena leucocephala (T-3), Sesbania grandiflora (T-4), Gliricidia maculata (T-5) or Ficus bangalensis (T-6) to study the effect of supplementation on digestibility of nutrients, growth performance and economics of feeding. The digestibility of nutrients in the diet was improved in lambs fed concentrate (T-1), Leucaena (T-3) or Sesbania (T-4) supplemented groups than in other treatments in experiment 1. The ADG (g), feed efficiency (P<0.01) and cost (Rs.) of feed/kg gain (P<0.05) were 59, 43, 44, 49, 41 and 40; 10.3, 13.8, 13.9, 11.9, 14.2 and 14.3 and 66.3, 74.5, 74.7, 64.1, 76.9 and 77.1 in lambs on treatments 1 to 6, respectively. In lambs stall-fed on fresh hybrid napier (NB-21) along with different supplements (experiment - 2), the digestibility of DM, CF, NDF, ADF, hemicellulose and cellulose was not significantly different among the treatments. The digestibility of CP in T-1 and T-4, EE in T-1 and T-5 was higher (P<0.01) than in other treatments while NFE and OM digestibility in T-1 was higher (P<0.01) than in T-6. The ADG (g) and feed efficiency were 43, 39, 46, 49,42 and 35 and 10.7, 11.8, 9.9, 9.5,10.6 and 11.9 in treatments 1 to 6, respectively. The cost of feed/kg gain (Rs.) was higher (P<0.01) in T-1 (68.5) than in T-3 (44.9) or T-4 (44.1) while in other treatments viz., T-2 (57.9), T-5 (49.5) and T-6 (59.7) it was comparable. The results suggested that economical and sustainable lamb production could be promoted by supplementation of Sesbania under semi-intensive system. Supplementation with Leucaena leucocephala, Sesbania or Gliricidia may be effective and economical under intensive system of rearing.

Key concepts: Gliricidia, Leucaena leucocephala, Sesbania, Leucaena, Animal science, Biology, Grazing, Meal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peformance of grazing or stall-fed lambs on supplementation with concentrate and roughage resources — Research Paper | ScholarLens