1994•中華民國消化系醫學會雜誌Requires access

Efficacy of Omeprazole Versus Famotidine in the Short-Term Treatment of Gastric Ulcer

Chiun‐Ku Lin, Kwok‐Hung Lai, Gin‐Ho Lo, Jin‐Shiung Cheng, Rong‐Long Huang, Chia-Fu Chang, Sam‐Ming Chen, Kent Tain

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of omeprazole and famotidine in the treatment of 60 aged patients with active gastric ulcers were studied. Five patients dropped out due to non-compliance and were unable to follow up endoscopic examination. The two groups were not signifcantly different with regard to sex, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and ulcer size. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole (Om 20 mg once per day, total 27 patients) or famotidine (Fa 20 mg twice per day, total 28 patients). Endoscopy, serum pepsinogen-I (PGI), gastrin-17 (G17), and cyclic AMP concentration were performed before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. The healing rate in those patients receiving omeprazole was 81.5% (22/27) at 4 weeks and 92.6% (25/27) at 8 weeks, while in the famotidine group, the healing rate was 67.8% (19/28) and 82.1% (23/28) respectively. Serum PGI and G17 showed marked elevation both in Omeprazole and Famotidine groups at the end of 4 weeks (p<0.01), While c-AMP did not show any significant change. The Om group showed slightly higher serum PGI and G17 both at the end of 4 and 8 weeks than the famotidine group. Serum PGI and G17 decreased toward the baseline after discontinuation of drugs. Significantly higher symptomatic relief was found in the omeprazole group, especially after 8 weeks (p<0.05). No major adverse effect was noted during treatment with both drugs. We concluded that omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, and famotidine 20 mg twice daily can therefore be deemed safe in aged patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy and safety of omeprazole and famotidine in the treatment of 60 aged patients with active gastric ulcers were studied. Five patients dropped out due to non-compliance and were unable to follow up endoscopic examination. The two groups were not signifcantly different with regard to sex, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and ulcer size. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole (Om 20 mg once per day, total 27 patients) or famotidine (Fa 20 mg twice per day, total 28 patients). Endoscopy, serum pepsinogen-I (PGI), gastrin-17 (G17), and cyclic AMP concentration were performed before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. The healing rate in those patients receiving omeprazole was 81.5% (22/27) at 4 weeks and 92.6% (25/27) at 8 weeks, while in the famotidine group, the healing rate was 67.8% (19/28) and 82.1% (23/28) respectively. Serum PGI and G17 showed marked elevation both in Omeprazole and Famotidine groups at the end of 4 weeks (p<0.01), While c-AMP did not show any significant change. The Om group showed slightly higher serum PGI and G17 both at the end of 4 and 8 weeks than the famotidine group. Serum PGI and G17 decreased toward the baseline after discontinuation of drugs. Significantly higher symptomatic relief was found in the omeprazole group, especially after 8 weeks (p<0.05). No major adverse effect was noted during treatment with both drugs. We concluded that omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, and famotidine 20 mg twice daily can therefore be deemed safe in aged patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy and safety of omeprazole and famotidine in the treatment of 60 aged patients with active gastric ulcers were studied. Five patients dropped out due to non-compliance and were unable to follow up endoscopic examination. The two groups were not signifcantly different with regard to sex, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and ulcer size. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole (Om 20 mg once per day, total 27 patients) or famotidine (Fa 20 mg twice per day, total 28 patients). Endoscopy, serum pepsinogen-I (PGI), gastrin-17 (G17), and cyclic AMP concentration were performed before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. The healing rate in those patients receiving omeprazole was 81.5% (22/27) at 4 weeks and 92.6% (25/27) at 8 weeks, while in the famotidine group, the healing rate was 67.8% (19/28) and 82.1% (23/28) respectively. Serum PGI and G17 showed marked elevation both in Omeprazole and Famotidine groups at the end of 4 weeks (p<0.01), While c-AMP did not show any significant change. The Om group showed slightly higher serum PGI and G17 both at the end of 4 and 8 weeks than the famotidine group. Serum PGI and G17 decreased toward the baseline after discontinuation of drugs. Significantly higher symptomatic relief was found in the omeprazole group, especially after 8 weeks (p<0.05). No major adverse effect was noted during treatment with both drugs. We concluded that omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, and famotidine 20 mg twice daily can therefore be deemed safe in aged patients.

Key concepts: Famotidine, Omeprazole, Medicine, Discontinuation, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of Omeprazole Versus Famotidine in the Short-Term Treatment of Gastric Ulcer — Research Paper | ScholarLens