1979Public Power; (United States)Requires access

Public's utility yardstick: preference clause spurs competition, permits local control

Lauren A. White

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The preference clause, which establishes a priority system for distributing Federal power, is credited with maintaining competition among utilities and permitting local control. Examples from the Midwest illustrate how municipal utilities are protected by their guaranteed access to federal power. The preference clause dates to Theodore Roosevelt's assertion that the Federal government has the right to control water-related resources. This led to legislation granting preference to those organizations which benefit the public and includes the Tennessee Valley Authority Act, the Rural Electrification Act, and the Bonneville Project Act. Post World War II policy shifts sought to make better use of non-preference power, but later administrations shifted policies back. The arguments presented by invester-owned utilities are examined and found to be invalid.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The preference clause, which establishes a priority system for distributing Federal power, is credited with maintaining competition among utilities and permitting local control. Examples from the Midwest illustrate how municipal utilities are protected by their guaranteed access to federal power. The preference clause dates to Theodore Roosevelt's assertion that the Federal government has the right to control water-related resources. This led to legislation granting preference to those organizations which benefit the public and includes the Tennessee Valley Authority Act, the Rural Electrification Act, and the Bonneville Project Act. Post World War II policy shifts sought to make better use of non-preference power, but later administrations shifted policies back. The arguments presented by invester-owned utilities are examined and found to be invalid.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The preference clause, which establishes a priority system for distributing Federal power, is credited with maintaining competition among utilities and permitting local control. Examples from the Midwest illustrate how municipal utilities are protected by their guaranteed access to federal power. The preference clause dates to Theodore Roosevelt's assertion that the Federal government has the right to control water-related resources. This led to legislation granting preference to those organizations which benefit the public and includes the Tennessee Valley Authority Act, the Rural Electrification Act, and the Bonneville Project Act. Post World War II policy shifts sought to make better use of non-preference power, but later administrations shifted policies back. The arguments presented by invester-owned utilities are examined and found to be invalid.

Key concepts: Preference, Yardstick, Legislation, Control (management), Competition (biology), Assertion, Government (linguistics), Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public's utility yardstick: preference clause spurs competition, permits local control — Research Paper | ScholarLens