Sex education: politicians, parents, teachers and teens.
Cynthia Dailard
Abstract
Cynthia Dailard
Abstract
For two decades policymakers have debated the relative merits of sexuality education that promotes abstinence as the only acceptable form of behavior outside of marriage and more comprehensive approaches that discuss contraception as well. The results of several new studies show that these debates may have had a considerable impact on what is being taught in the classroom; moreover they strongly indicate that politicians--in their drive to promote morality- based abstinence-only education--are out of touch with what teachers parents and teens think should be taught. (excerpt)
OpenAlex reports 69 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For two decades policymakers have debated the relative merits of sexuality education that promotes abstinence as the only acceptable form of behavior outside of marriage and more comprehensive approaches that discuss contraception as well. The results of several new studies show that these debates may have had a considerable impact on what is being taught in the classroom; moreover they strongly indicate that politicians--in their drive to promote morality- based abstinence-only education--are out of touch with what teachers parents and teens think should be taught. (excerpt)
Key concepts: Abstinence, Sex education, Sexuality education, Morality, Sexual abstinence, Human sexuality, Psychology, Family planning