Book Review of The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America
Laurie L. Levenson
Abstract
Laurie L. Levenson
Abstract
This Book Review of Jed Handelsman Shugerman’s, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, focuses on the crucial relationship between judicial independence and the times in which a judge rules. In each era of American history, judges have faced challenges to their independence. At some points in our history, judicial elections have been designed to safeguard the judge’s independent role. At other times, it has been viewed as an attack. What is most important for students and scholars is that they understand the historical and political forces confronting judges as they attempt to follow the rule of law.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This Book Review of Jed Handelsman Shugerman’s, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, focuses on the crucial relationship between judicial independence and the times in which a judge rules. In each era of American history, judges have faced challenges to their independence. At some points in our history, judicial elections have been designed to safeguard the judge’s independent role. At other times, it has been viewed as an attack. What is most important for students and scholars is that they understand the historical and political forces confronting judges as they attempt to follow the rule of law.
Key concepts: Judicial independence, Independence (probability theory), Law, Political science, Politics, Judicial activism, Judicial discretion, Judicial opinion