1999•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Changing Boundaries between Federal and Local Law Enforcement

Daniel C. Richman

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

This piece addresses the development of federal criminal law over the last century, from a small group of statutes protecting direct federal interests to a vast body of law that has effectively eliminated the distinction between federal crime and the conduct traditionally prosecuted by state and local authorities. Although the overlap between these hitherto separate spheres now seems virtually complete, the article argues that any account based only on substantive law would be misleading, because it fails to consider potent political and institutional limitations on federal powers. After examining these restraints, the article concludes by discussing the consequences of a system in which the boundaries between federal prosecutions and state and local prosecutions are set by the enforcers themselves, and not by Congress.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This piece addresses the development of federal criminal law over the last century, from a small group of statutes protecting direct federal interests to a vast body of law that has effectively eliminated the distinction between federal crime and the conduct traditionally prosecuted by state and local authorities. Although the overlap between these hitherto separate spheres now seems virtually complete, the article argues that any account based only on substantive law would be misleading, because it fails to consider potent political and institutional limitations on federal powers. After examining these restraints, the article concludes by discussing the consequences of a system in which the boundaries between federal prosecutions and state and local prosecutions are set by the enforcers themselves, and not by Congress.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This piece addresses the development of federal criminal law over the last century, from a small group of statutes protecting direct federal interests to a vast body of law that has effectively eliminated the distinction between federal crime and the conduct traditionally prosecuted by state and local authorities. Although the overlap between these hitherto separate spheres now seems virtually complete, the article argues that any account based only on substantive law would be misleading, because it fails to consider potent political and institutional limitations on federal powers. After examining these restraints, the article concludes by discussing the consequences of a system in which the boundaries between federal prosecutions and state and local prosecutions are set by the enforcers themselves, and not by Congress.

Key concepts: Statute, Federal law, Political science, Law, Law enforcement, State (computer science), Politics, State law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Changing Boundaries between Federal and Local Law Enforcement — Research Paper | ScholarLens