2000PubMedRequires access

[When should mitral valve prolapse be considered a real disease?].

J Bensaïd

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Mitral valve prolapse should be considered as a disease when superior displacement of the mitral leaflets during systole is more than 2 mm with a maximal leaflet thickness of at least 5 mm. Using these criteria, the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse is 1.3% in the general population, nearly the same in men and women. Serious complications may occur during follow-up with a 1 to 3% patient-year risk. The most important complication is mitral regurgitation, mainly due to rupture of the chordae tendineae, which must be quickly corrected by surgical repair. Second is infective endocarditis, a complication which may occur particularly in men older than 45 years of age with systolic murmur. Arrhythmias are not infrequent but ischemic neurologic events are unusual, especially in young patients. Cases of sudden death have occasionally been reported.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mitral valve prolapse should be considered as a disease when superior displacement of the mitral leaflets during systole is more than 2 mm with a maximal leaflet thickness of at least 5 mm. Using these criteria, the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse is 1.3% in the general population, nearly the same in men and women. Serious complications may occur during follow-up with a 1 to 3% patient-year risk. The most important complication is mitral regurgitation, mainly due to rupture of the chordae tendineae, which must be quickly corrected by surgical repair. Second is infective endocarditis, a complication which may occur particularly in men older than 45 years of age with systolic murmur. Arrhythmias are not infrequent but ischemic neurologic events are unusual, especially in young patients. Cases of sudden death have occasionally been reported.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mitral valve prolapse should be considered as a disease when superior displacement of the mitral leaflets during systole is more than 2 mm with a maximal leaflet thickness of at least 5 mm. Using these criteria, the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse is 1.3% in the general population, nearly the same in men and women. Serious complications may occur during follow-up with a 1 to 3% patient-year risk. The most important complication is mitral regurgitation, mainly due to rupture of the chordae tendineae, which must be quickly corrected by surgical repair. Second is infective endocarditis, a complication which may occur particularly in men older than 45 years of age with systolic murmur. Arrhythmias are not infrequent but ischemic neurologic events are unusual, especially in young patients. Cases of sudden death have occasionally been reported.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mitral valve prolapse, Chordae tendineae, Mitral regurgitation, Complication, Cardiology, Mitral valve, Systole

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[When should mitral valve prolapse be considered a real disease?]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens