1986OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Study to determine the cost-effectiveness of using steam-injected gas turbines with coal gasification equipment. Final report. [Intercooling]

J.D. Frasca, H.W. Klumpe, Jason McCrank

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for integrated gasification-gas turbine power plants. The British Gas/Lurgi slagging, fixed-bed gasifier was employed to produce clean fuel gas from coal. The clean fuel gas was fired in steam injected gas turbines. The gas turbines were based upon expected performance of GE LM-5000 gas turbines modified to accommodate mass injection of steam produced through turbine exhaust heat recovery. Gas turbine configurations with (ISTIG) and without (STIG) intercooled air compressors were examined and compared to a conventional combined cycle approach. Performance for the intercooled case was slightly poorer than the combined cycle case, while the non-intercooled case was considerably worse. Capital costs of both the STIG and ISTIG plants were estimated higher than the combined cycle. Costs of electricity from the STIG and ISTIG plants were also estimated to be higher than from the combined cycle plant, although the ISTIG and combined cycle costs were very close. 4 figs., 13 tabs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for integrated gasification-gas turbine power plants. The British Gas/Lurgi slagging, fixed-bed gasifier was employed to produce clean fuel gas from coal. The clean fuel gas was fired in steam injected gas turbines. The gas turbines were based upon expected performance of GE LM-5000 gas turbines modified to accommodate mass injection of steam produced through turbine exhaust heat recovery. Gas turbine configurations with (ISTIG) and without (STIG) intercooled air compressors were examined and compared to a conventional combined cycle approach. Performance for the intercooled case was slightly poorer than the combined cycle case, while the non-intercooled case was considerably worse. Capital costs of both the STIG and ISTIG plants were estimated higher than the combined cycle. Costs of electricity from the STIG and ISTIG plants were also estimated to be higher than from the combined cycle plant, although the ISTIG and combined cycle costs were very close. 4 figs., 13 tabs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for integrated gasification-gas turbine power plants. The British Gas/Lurgi slagging, fixed-bed gasifier was employed to produce clean fuel gas from coal. The clean fuel gas was fired in steam injected gas turbines. The gas turbines were based upon expected performance of GE LM-5000 gas turbines modified to accommodate mass injection of steam produced through turbine exhaust heat recovery. Gas turbine configurations with (ISTIG) and without (STIG) intercooled air compressors were examined and compared to a conventional combined cycle approach. Performance for the intercooled case was slightly poorer than the combined cycle case, while the non-intercooled case was considerably worse. Capital costs of both the STIG and ISTIG plants were estimated higher than the combined cycle. Costs of electricity from the STIG and ISTIG plants were also estimated to be higher than from the combined cycle plant, although the ISTIG and combined cycle costs were very close. 4 figs., 13 tabs.

Key concepts: Combined cycle, Gas compressor, Wood gas generator, Gas turbines, Capital cost, Coal, Waste management, Coal gasification

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study to determine the cost-effectiveness of using steam-injected gas turbines with coal gasification equipment. Final report. [Intercooling] — Research Paper | ScholarLens