2000Journal of NeurophysiologyRequires access

Response of Cutaneous A- and C-Fiber Nociceptors in the Monkey to Controlled-Force Stimuli

Robert M. Slugg, Richard A. Meyer, James N. Campbell

Open publisher page 165 citations

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the capacity of primary afferent nociceptive fibers (nociceptors) to encode information about noxious mechanical stimuli in primates. Teased-fiber techniques were used to record from 14 A-fiber nociceptors and 18 C-fiber nociceptors that innervated the hairy skin. Stimulus-response functions were examined with an ascending series of force-controlled stimuli. Stimulus-interaction effects were examined with use of a series of paired stimuli in which the interval between the stimulus pairs was varied systematically. Both A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors exhibited a slowly adapting response to the stepped force stimuli. The response of the A fibers increased monotonically with increasing force, whereas the response of the C fibers reached a plateau at low force levels. The slope of the stimulus-response function for the A fibers was significantly steeper than that for the C fibers, and the total response was greater. The A fibers also provided more discriminative information regarding stimulus intensity. The C fibers demonstrated a significant fatigue in response when the interstimulus interval between the paired stimuli was </=150 s, whereas the A fibers did not demonstrate a significant fatigue until the interstimulus interval was </=30 s. This fatigue in response was not due to changes in tissue compliance. These results suggest that A- and C-fiber nociceptors have different mechanical transduction mechanisms. A-fiber nociceptors exhibit steeper stimulus-response functions and less fatigue than C-fiber nociceptors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The goal of this study was to determine the capacity of primary afferent nociceptive fibers (nociceptors) to encode information about noxious mechanical stimuli in primates. Teased-fiber techniques were used to record from 14 A-fiber nociceptors and 18 C-fiber nociceptors that innervated the hairy skin. Stimulus-response functions were examined with an ascending series of force-controlled stimuli. Stimulus-interaction effects were examined with use of a series of paired stimuli in which the interval between the stimulus pairs was varied systematically. Both A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors exhibited a slowly adapting response to the stepped force stimuli. The response of the A fibers increased monotonically with increasing force, whereas the response of the C fibers reached a plateau at low force levels. The slope of the stimulus-response function for the A fibers was significantly steeper than that for the C fibers, and the total response was greater. The A fibers also provided more discriminative information regarding stimulus intensity. The C fibers demonstrated a significant fatigue in response when the interstimulus interval between the paired stimuli was </=150 s, whereas the A fibers did not demonstrate a significant fatigue until the interstimulus interval was </=30 s. This fatigue in response was not due to changes in tissue compliance. These results suggest that A- and C-fiber nociceptors have different mechanical transduction mechanisms. A-fiber nociceptors exhibit steeper stimulus-response functions and less fatigue than C-fiber nociceptors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 165 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the capacity of primary afferent nociceptive fibers (nociceptors) to encode information about noxious mechanical stimuli in primates. Teased-fiber techniques were used to record from 14 A-fiber nociceptors and 18 C-fiber nociceptors that innervated the hairy skin. Stimulus-response functions were examined with an ascending series of force-controlled stimuli. Stimulus-interaction effects were examined with use of a series of paired stimuli in which the interval between the stimulus pairs was varied systematically. Both A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors exhibited a slowly adapting response to the stepped force stimuli. The response of the A fibers increased monotonically with increasing force, whereas the response of the C fibers reached a plateau at low force levels. The slope of the stimulus-response function for the A fibers was significantly steeper than that for the C fibers, and the total response was greater. The A fibers also provided more discriminative information regarding stimulus intensity. The C fibers demonstrated a significant fatigue in response when the interstimulus interval between the paired stimuli was </=150 s, whereas the A fibers did not demonstrate a significant fatigue until the interstimulus interval was </=30 s. This fatigue in response was not due to changes in tissue compliance. These results suggest that A- and C-fiber nociceptors have different mechanical transduction mechanisms. A-fiber nociceptors exhibit steeper stimulus-response functions and less fatigue than C-fiber nociceptors.

Key concepts: Nociceptor, Stimulus (psychology), Interstimulus interval, Nociception, Neuroscience, Noxious stimulus, Chemistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response of Cutaneous A- and C-Fiber Nociceptors in the Monkey to Controlled-Force Stimuli — Research Paper | ScholarLens