2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Second nature : on second-class peoples and landscapes.

Christina. Boyles

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This project revises previous scholarship by arguing that the field of ecofeminism does not adequately address the concerns of women of color. Since ecofeminism tends to focus on white women and pristine landscapes, it fails to acknowledge the abuse and mistreatment of marginalized bodies and landscapes. To redress this issue, this project focuses entirely on locations in which race, gender, and environmental abuse are inextricably linked. The four authors examined in this study are Zora Neale Hurston, Maxine Hong Kingston, Leslie Marmon Silko, and Gloria Anzaldua. Although scholars have examined these authors individually, none, as of yet, have considered them together. One reason may be that it can be difficult to examine multiple cultural groups within a single project without becoming reductive. This project, however, does not posit that all multiethnic groups within the United States are the same, but rather that they all experience ecological injustice due to the racial hierarchies undergirding American life. In particular, this project combines environmental science with literature in order to holistically explore natural and human ecologies at a specific location and moment in time. Environmental sources include data gathered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Wildlife Federation, the Central Arizona Project, and the Wetlands Project. Their work provides insight into the environmental harm experienced by many American landscapes but also, consciously or otherwise, fails to consider how race is inextricably woven into these acts. To highlight these gaps in environmental data, examines women of color’s experiences within these landscapes. The first chapter explores Zora Neale Hurston’s depiction of the wetlands as harmful to black migrant workers. The second chapter examines Maxine Hong Kingston’s critique of war and imperialism through descriptions of natural disasters. The third chapter, concentrating on the works of Leslie Marmon Silko, comments upon capitalism by noting the ways in which government and big business fail to address issues of water scarcity in the American Southwest. The last chapter uses posthumanist theory to show the connection between animal and human oppression. Taken together, these texts reveal that environmental oppression is inextricably tied to race and gender.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This project revises previous scholarship by arguing that the field of ecofeminism does not adequately address the concerns of women of color. Since ecofeminism tends to focus on white women and pristine landscapes, it fails to acknowledge the abuse and mistreatment of marginalized bodies and landscapes. To redress this issue, this project focuses entirely on locations in which race, gender, and environmental abuse are inextricably linked. The four authors examined in this study are Zora Neale Hurston, Maxine Hong Kingston, Leslie Marmon Silko, and Gloria Anzaldua. Although scholars have examined these authors individually, none, as of yet, have considered them together. One reason may be that it can be difficult to examine multiple cultural groups within a single project without becoming reductive. This project, however, does not posit that all multiethnic groups within the United States are the same, but rather that they all experience ecological injustice due to the racial hierarchies undergirding American life. In particular, this project combines environmental science with literature in order to holistically explore natural and human ecologies at a specific location and moment in time. Environmental sources include data gathered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Wildlife Federation, the Central Arizona Project, and the Wetlands Project. Their work provides insight into the environmental harm experienced by many American landscapes but also, consciously or otherwise, fails to consider how race is inextricably woven into these acts. To highlight these gaps in environmental data, examines women of color’s experiences within these landscapes. The first chapter explores Zora Neale Hurston’s depiction of the wetlands as harmful to black migrant workers. The second chapter examines Maxine Hong Kingston’s critique of war and imperialism through descriptions of natural disasters. The third chapter, concentrating on the works of Leslie Marmon Silko, comments upon capitalism by noting the ways in which government and big business fail to address issues of water scarcity in the American Southwest. The last chapter uses posthumanist theory to show the connection between animal and human oppression. Taken together, these texts reveal that environmental oppression is inextricably tied to race and gender.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This project revises previous scholarship by arguing that the field of ecofeminism does not adequately address the concerns of women of color. Since ecofeminism tends to focus on white women and pristine landscapes, it fails to acknowledge the abuse and mistreatment of marginalized bodies and landscapes. To redress this issue, this project focuses entirely on locations in which race, gender, and environmental abuse are inextricably linked. The four authors examined in this study are Zora Neale Hurston, Maxine Hong Kingston, Leslie Marmon Silko, and Gloria Anzaldua. Although scholars have examined these authors individually, none, as of yet, have considered them together. One reason may be that it can be difficult to examine multiple cultural groups within a single project without becoming reductive. This project, however, does not posit that all multiethnic groups within the United States are the same, but rather that they all experience ecological injustice due to the racial hierarchies undergirding American life. In particular, this project combines environmental science with literature in order to holistically explore natural and human ecologies at a specific location and moment in time. Environmental sources include data gathered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Wildlife Federation, the Central Arizona Project, and the Wetlands Project. Their work provides insight into the environmental harm experienced by many American landscapes but also, consciously or otherwise, fails to consider how race is inextricably woven into these acts. To highlight these gaps in environmental data, examines women of color’s experiences within these landscapes. The first chapter explores Zora Neale Hurston’s depiction of the wetlands as harmful to black migrant workers. The second chapter examines Maxine Hong Kingston’s critique of war and imperialism through descriptions of natural disasters. The third chapter, concentrating on the works of Leslie Marmon Silko, comments upon capitalism by noting the ways in which government and big business fail to address issues of water scarcity in the American Southwest. The last chapter uses posthumanist theory to show the connection between animal and human oppression. Taken together, these texts reveal that environmental oppression is inextricably tied to race and gender.

Key concepts: Environmentalism, Redress, Scholarship, Environmental ethics, Environmental justice, Agency (philosophy), Injustice, Ecofeminism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Second nature : on second-class peoples and landscapes. — Research Paper | ScholarLens